During tests, some creation of user records would unnecessarily trigger
password reset or set a password, both of which would trigger password
hashing which takes some time (for good reasons).
Fix by:
* passing no_reset_password in YAML tests and some Python tests still
missing it (a number of Python tests already used it)
* removing passwords from YAML records as they're never necessary, the
test user records are not expected to ever log in
The previous filters didn't take timezones into account, and
returned stringified naive datetime values in local browser
time. Those would then be interpreted by the server-side as
UTC date, and depending on the current timezone offset vs UTC,
yield partially incorrect results.
By returning directly a datetime.datetime object instead of
a stringified version (see previous commit 76881fb),
we can get the expected result regarless of the timezone.
Fixes#2972Closes#6229
opw-621282
When sending an email of the registration/confirmation, the context was lost and the tempate sticked in en_US.
With the patch, the template will use the current user's language.
Otherwise all templates are displayed and this will lead to some issues.
Also added a description on event.registration, because currently its
displayed name is Email Thread.
* remove old 'day', 'month', 'field' and replace them by the actual
date/datetime field
* remove weird cast to char when creating the view to prevent crash
when grouping on them
* remove duplicates (such as 'creation_date' and 'create_date')
* fix typing errors (field type date defined as a datetime in the
postgres view)
* fix search view definition
- display_name uses name_get and not the other way around:
name_get should not call _compute_display_name, _compute_display_name should call name_get.
The previous behaviour was not backward-compatible with the old api.
All the models redefining name_get would have 2 different behaviors between name_get and display_name.
- Do not set an inverse function to display_name:
In most cases, writing on display_name writes on _rec_name (if any, not mandatory).
If the display_name computation is redefined, we need to redefine as well the inverse method to avoid unexpected behaviour
This required to also modify tests in base_import as readonly fields are avoided.
- Remove search method on display_name:
For the same reason as for the first point, it could be good that searching on display_name use name_search (and not the other way around).
However doing this would be very inefficiant (need to do the search, without limit, extract the ids of the name_get result just to generate
a subdomain ('id', 'in', [...]). As in most cases it would anyway mean to search on the _rec_name it's better to directly do so.
- Changing label to avoid mismatch:
In view displaying the list of fields or when a match is made on the label of a field (e.g. when importing csv file,
matching is made on both label and technical name), the fact that display_name field has '
Calling it 'Display Name' will avoid most errors.
- remove display_name definition from website_forum_doc,ir_model:
These fields are doing the same thing as the display_name of the new api, we can remove them.
We need to keep the one for res.partner as it's a stored field.
Rebranding has been done in:
- data/demo files
- html templates
- help notices
- comments
- logger messages
- and other various messages
(Commit taken from odoo-dev:8.0-improve-openerp-odoo-rlu at rev 7deaa08)
Closes#1260
Odoo Translation Bot
Xavier Morel
Martin Trigaux
Olivier Dony
Denis Ledoux
Nicolas Lempereur
Aaron Bohy
Antony Lesuisse
Martin Trigaux
Thibault Delavallée
Fabien Pinckaers
qdc
Christophe Simonis
Géry Debongnie
rlu-odoo
Richard Mathot