1. According to ETSI TS 129 118 4.1, if the Network Access Mode (NAM) is set
to "Packet only," no SGs association should be established.
2. If the NAM is set to "Packet and Circuit," and the SGs association is
rejected by the CS core, this rejection should only impact
the SGs association itself and not result in a UE attach rejection
for a UE with a valid HSS account.
Assume the UE has Attached, the session has been created,
and is in the IDLE state with the UEContextRelease process.
This could result in the following call flow.
1. TAU request without Integrity Protected
2. Authentication request/response
3. Security-mode command/complete
MME can be performed simultaneously by the HSS(S6A) and UE(S1AP).
Update-Location-Request
Service request
Service reject
Delete Session Request
Delete Session Response
Update-Location-Answer
UEContextReleaseCommand for Service reject
TAU reject
UEContextReleaseCommand for TAU reject
UEContextReleaseComplete
UEContextReleaseComplete
MME crashes when UE sends a service request(S1AP) during ULR/ULA(S6A) with HSS,
which has been fixed.
Based on the standard document below, when the UE is in the IDLE state,
we checked the implicit timer and tried to send a message to the UE,
but it doesn't work properly.
So, first of all, I deleted the related code.
- TS 24.301 Ch 5.3.7
If ISR is not activated, the network behaviour upon expiry of
the mobile reachable timer is network dependent, but typically
the network stops sending paging messages to the UE on the
first expiry, and may take other appropriate actions
- TS 24.501 Ch 5.3.7
The network behaviour upon expiry of the mobile reachable timer is network dependent,
but typically the network stops sending paging messages to the UE on the first expiry,
and may take other appropriate actions.
* [MME] Introduce aging timers
* Creating three new timers
* mirroring work done by gstaa on the AMF
* Implicit detach procedures added
* Fix for detach from unknown UE
* no Purge Timer, no config, expanded code
The problem occurred in the following scenario:
1. VLR sent PAGING-REQUEST to the MME
2. MME sent S1-Paging to the UE
3. Paging failed
4. MME responded SERVICE-REQUEST to the VLR
5. VLR sent DOWNLINK-UNITDATA to the MME
6. Even though there is no S1 Context,
MME try to sent DownlinkNASTransport message to the UE.
7. So, the problem occurred.
I've changed the number 4 PAGING-REJECT instead of SERVICE-REQUEST.
- Added diameter dictionary definitions for Cancel Location
- Cancel Location will completely remove UE from MME, allow for a fresh IMSI attach to occur on next attempt.
- T3422 is used for detach request.
- Added new handling for s6a events in mme-sm, as not all s6a messages are at attach now. Maybe there's something in a state machine I should've been using here instead of a new flag?
- Testing was completed with UE in idle and connected. With CLR flags indicating re-attach required and without. Also sending CLR after UE detach. And then sending again when mme_ue is empty.
When a UE that requests slices tries to connect and there are no slices configured, the reject message is:
5GMM cause = 0x7 (5GS Services not allowed)
however it should be:
5GMM cause = 0x3e (No network slices available)
All 5GMM cause value in reject message is reviewed in this commit
When connecting to the UPF port for the PFCP protocol (8805) and sending
an association setup request followed by a session establishment request
with a PDI Network Instance set to ‘internet’, it causes a stack corruption
to occur.
So, ogs_fqdn_parse() fixed.
All process will be forcely exited if it failed to encode the S1AP/NGAP/GTP/PFCP message. It is to make sure there was no problem with the encoding of open5gs.
* HACK: Don't retransmit InitialContextSetupReq
Related: #256
* HACK: Don't use buggy sa1p_copy() in eNBConfigTransfer
Related: #257
* mme: don't reject with 'IMSI is unknown in HLR' (permanent reject)
* MME: Implement S6a result -> EMM cause code mapping
Closes: #263
* Spencer: modification to Haralds fix because macros are now renamed
* MME: don't assert on MAC failures of uplink NAS frames
Closes: #267
* MME: Avoid ogs_assert() in many situations
We don't want to crash the entire program just because a message
received from an external entity didn't match some of our expectations.
* compiles fine, checked DIFFs and only difference is the ogs_assert -> ogs_expect
Sukchan Lee
jmasterfunk84
Spencer Sevilla