A friend in the community was trying to connect an SMF made by another
manufacturer with an SBI interface and found a big problem with Open5GS.
All of the code in the part that generates the Resource URI
from HTTP.location is invalid.
For example, suppose we create a Resource URI with SMContext as below.
{apiRoot}/nsmf-pdusession/<apiVersion>/sm-contexts/{smContextRef}
In this case, Open5GS extracted the {smContextRef} part of the HTTP.location
and appended it to the beginning
{apiRoot}/nsmf-pdusession/<apiVersion>/sm-contexts/.
This implementation may not work properly if the apiRoot changes.
Consider a different port number as shown below.
<HTTP.location>
127.0.0.4:9999/nsmf-pdusession/v1/sm-contexts/1
The SMF may send an apiRoot to the AMF with a changed port number,
in which case the AMF must honor it.
Therefore, instead of extracting only the smContextRef from HTTP.location,
we modified it to use the whole thing to create a Resource URI.
We modified all NFs that use HTTP.location in the same way, not just SMFs.
In InitialUEMessage, send a NAS message with a message type
other than Registration Request, Deregistration Request, or Service Request,
the following messages from UE will not be accepted.
We found this issue in not only the initial state but multiple states.
We believe if an attacker has the ability to inject a NAS message to the core,
it can perform a DoS attack on the victim UE.
So, I've fixed that The MME/AMF deletes MME_UE_S1AP_ID/AMF_UE_NGAP_ID,
and will not accept any following messages from the UE.
The AMF will crash on the following locations when it receives a sequence
of NAS messages from a UE.
- ogs_nas_encrypt: Assertion `pkbuf->len' failed. (../lib/nas/common/security.c:86)
- gmm_state_authentication: Assertion `r != OGS_ERROR' failed. (../src/amf/gmm-sm.c:1561)
Besides the crashes found above, an incorrect protocol transition
is identified in Open5GS. Without any Registration/Attach Request message,
when the Identity Response message sent, the Core Network responds
with an Authentication Request message. According to the standard,
only the Registration/Attach Request message can start a state transition
from the 5GMM/EMM-DEREGISTERED state to the 5GMM/EMM-COMMON-PROCEDURE-INITIATED.
So I've modified the relevant code to address these issues.
If a Create Bearer Response occurs after a Delete Bearer Response,
SGW-C crashes.
The execution is stopped by the following ASSERT
because it tries to access the UL Tunnel
deleted by the Delete Bearer Response.
```
03/28 17:28:41.229: [gtp] DEBUG: [7] LOCAL Find GTPv2 peer [172.22.0.9]:2123 (../lib/gtp/xact.c:949)
03/28 17:28:41.229: [gtp] DEBUG: [7] LOCAL Receive peer [172.22.0.9]:2123 (../lib/gtp/xact.c:966)
03/28 17:28:41.229: [gtp] DEBUG: [7] LOCAL UPD RX-96 peer [172.22.0.9]:2123 (../lib/gtp/xact.c:448)
03/28 17:28:41.229: [sgwc] DEBUG: Create Bearer Response (../src/sgwc/s11-handler.c:707)
03/28 17:28:41.229: [gtp] DEBUG: [7] LOCAL Commit peer [172.22.0.9]:2123 (../lib/gtp/xact.c:629)
03/28 17:28:41.230: [gtp] DEBUG: [7] LOCAL Delete peer [172.22.0.9]:2123 (../lib/gtp/xact.c:1149)
03/28 17:28:41.230: [sgwc] FATAL: sgwc_s11_handle_create_bearer_response: Assertion `ul_tunnel' failed. (../src/sgwc/s11-handler.c:802)
03/28 17:28:41.231: [core] FATAL: backtrace() returned 8 addresses (../lib/core/ogs-abort.c:37)
./open5gs-sgwcd(+0x189b7) [0x5b3c92cf09b7]
./open5gs-sgwcd(+0x13c6d) [0x5b3c92cebc6d]
/open5gs/install/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libogscore.so.2(ogs_fsm_dispatch+0x113) [0x70600ed63402]
./open5gs-sgwcd(+0x629d) [0x5b3c92cde29d]
/open5gs/install/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libogscore.so.2(+0x11754) [0x70600ed54754]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0(+0x8609) [0x70600ecfc609]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(clone+0x43) [0x70600ec21353]
```
To solve this problem, I have modified to handle the exception appropriately,
display the error situation in the Cause of the Create Bearer Response,
and proceed with the execution.
Cause is set according to particular NF standard.
Additionally:
- OGS_SBI_HTTP_STATUS_MEHTOD_NOT_ALLOWED typo fixed.
- [PCF] Fixed SM Policy establishment error handling
First of all, it crashes when creating a Dedicated Bearer
on the default Session that is created for the first time.
This behavior should be possible, so the related ASSERT is removed.
Next, the InitialContextRequest is modified
during the Attach Request to include the first Bearer.
Finally, there was an issue where trying to create a Dedicated Bearer
with SGsAP enabled resulted in an InitialContextSetupRequest message
with a PTI of zero. This is because MME initializes the PTI to 0
upon receiving the Create Bearer Request while processing SGsAP.
All of these issues has been fixed.
1. According to ETSI TS 129 118 4.1, if the Network Access Mode (NAM) is set
to "Packet only," no SGs association should be established.
2. If the NAM is set to "Packet and Circuit," and the SGs association is
rejected by the CS core, this rejection should only impact
the SGs association itself and not result in a UE attach rejection
for a UE with a valid HSS account.
If eg. PCRF or AAA diameter link is not yet ready (eg. PCRF crashed), and
a client sends a CreateSessionRequest announcing its ow F-TEID,
then open5gs-smfd answers with Create Session Response Cause=
"Remote peer not responding", but it is not setting the received F-TEID
in the header of the response, instead it sends with TEI=0.
As a result, the peer cannot match the CreateSessionResponse, and needs
to rely on its own timeout timer to figure out that specific request failed.
This also happens in PFCP, so to solve this problem, I added teid/seid_presence
to the interface that sends the error message as shown below.
void ogs_gtp2_send_error_message(ogs_gtp_xact_t *xact,
int teid_presence, uint32_t teid, uint8_t type, uint8_t cause_value);
void ogs_pfcp_send_error_message(
ogs_pfcp_xact_t *xact, int seid_presence, uint64_t seid, uint8_t type,
uint8_t cause_value, uint16_t offending_ie_value);
When building the MIME Multipart Media Encapsulation format
within an SBI message in the NF of a third-party product,
Open5GS does not parse properly if it contains a Preamble CRLF.
For example,
```
TCP/HTTP2
Stream: Data, Stream ID: 1, Length 841
MIME Multipart Media Encapsulation, Type: multipart/related, Boundary: "gc0pJq08jU534c"
--->Preamble: 0d0a
First boundary: --gc0pJq08jU534c\r\n
Encapsulated multipart part: (application/json)
Boundary: \r\n--gc0pJq08jU534c\r\n
Encapsulated multipart part: (application/vnd.3gpp.5gnas)
Boundary: \r\n--gc0pJq08jU534c\r\n
Encapsulated multipart part: (application/vnd.3gpp.ngap)
Last Boundary: \r\n--gc0pJq08jU534c--\r\n
```
Assume the UE has Attached, the session has been created,
and is in the IDLE state with the UEContextRelease process.
This could result in the following call flow.
1. TAU request without Integrity Protected
2. Authentication request/response
3. Security-mode command/complete
MME can be performed simultaneously by the HSS(S6A) and UE(S1AP).
Update-Location-Request
Service request
Service reject
Delete Session Request
Delete Session Response
Update-Location-Answer
UEContextReleaseCommand for Service reject
TAU reject
UEContextReleaseCommand for TAU reject
UEContextReleaseComplete
UEContextReleaseComplete
MME crashes when UE sends a service request(S1AP) during ULR/ULA(S6A) with HSS,
which has been fixed.
1. HandoverRequired
2. HandoverRequest
3. HandoverFailure
4. UEContextReleaseCommand
5. HandoverPreparationFailure
If UEContextReleaseComplete is not received,
the Source-UE will have the Target-UE.
6. HandoverRequired
There may be cases where the Source UE has a Target UE
from a previous HandoverRequired process. In this case,
it is recommended to force the deletion of the Target UE information
when receiving a new HandoverRequired.
7. HandoverRequest
8. HandoverFailure
9. UEContextReleaseCommand
10. UEContextReleaseComplete
11. HandoverPreparationFailure
... Crashed ...
For bi-directions, the rules are created in the same form as for downlink
as shown below, so to apply them for uplink, we need to swap the rules
according to the interface.
RX : permit out from <P-CSCF_RTP_IP> <P-CSCF_RTP_PORT> to <UE_IP> <UE_PORT>
GX : permit out from <P-CSCF_RTP_IP> <P-CSCF_RTP_PORT> to <UE_IP> <UE_PORT>
PFCP : permit out from <P-CSCF_RTP_IP> <P-CSCF_RTP_PORT> to <UE_IP> <UE_PORT>
RULE : Source <P-CSCF_RTP_IP> <P-CSCF_RTP_PORT> Destination <UE_IP> <UE_PORT>
TFT : Local <UE_IP> <UE_PORT> REMOTE <P-CSCF_RTP_IP> <P-CSCF_RTP_PORT>
RX : permit in from <UE_IP> <UE_PORT> to <P-CSCF_RTP_IP> <P-CSCF_RTP_PORT>
GX : permit out from <P-CSCF_RTP_IP> <P-CSCF_RTP_PORT> to <UE_IP> <UE_PORT>
PFCP : permit out from <P-CSCF_RTP_IP> <P-CSCF_RTP_PORT> to <UE_IP> <UE_PORT>
RULE : Source <UE_IP> <UE_PORT> Destination <P-CSCF_RTP_IP> <P-CSCF_RTP_PORT>
TFT : Local <UE_IP> <UE_PORT> REMOTE <P-CSCF_RTP_IP> <P-CSCF_RTP_PORT>
APER encoding fails when using the asn_uint642INTEGER function on a 32-bit machine as shown below.
```C
asn_uint642INTEGER(AMF_UE_NGAP_ID, 0xffffffff);
...
aper_encode_to_buffer(...)
```
INTEGER APER encode/decode functions seem to be operating internally with long variables instead of intmax_t.
That is probably the reason of the failure.
@v0-e fixed this issues in the mouse07410/asn1c pull request.
https://github.com/mouse07410/asn1c/pull/176https://github.com/mouse07410/asn1c/pull/177
Problems with Purge-UE-Request/Answer can occur in the following situations
1. Attach Request
2. Authentication request
3. Authentication reject
4. UEContextReleaseCommand
5. UEContextReleaseComplete
6. Purge-UE-Request
7. Attach Request
8. Purge-UE-Answer
9. (UE Context Remove)
To resolve this issue, we have changed to delete the UE-Context
via mme_ue_remove() immediately upon receiving UEContextReleaseComplete()
without calling mme_s6a_send_pur().
There is an issue with SESSION RELEASE not working properly
depending on the PDU session release complete order
in the PDUSessionResourceReleaseResponse.
If the AMF receives PDUSessionResourceReleaseResponse
followed by PDU session release complete, it works correctly.
However, if it receives PDU session release complete
followed by PDUSessionResourceReleaseResponse, it does not work correctly
and sends an Error Indication to the UE/gNB.
To fix this issue, we added pdu_session_release_complete_received and
pdu_session_resource_release_response_received to the content
so that CLEAR_SM_CONTEXT_REF() is executed when both are received.
Within the PathSwitchRequest packet,
the E-RABToBeSwitchedDLList has two bearers.
If the E-RAB-ID of both bearers is 5, the MME's list memory is destroyed
and the MME crashes. To fix this issue, we modified the code so that
the MME can work correctly with invalid S1AP messages.
While they were continuing their fuzzy testing and developing PacketRusher, an unusual issue with the AMF was observed. The problem arises when a single Ethernet frame containing three bundled SCTP chunks is sent. This behavior is reproduced with PacketRusher when attempting to concurrently register two UEs with the same MSIN.
The expected behavior is that the PDU Session Establishment Accept is sent inside a DownlinkNASTransport to RAN UE NGAP ID 1. However, it is actually sent inside an InitialContextSetupRequest to RAN UE NGAP ID 2. The MAC of this NAS message is invalid for the Security Context of RAN UE NGAP ID 2 (probably valid for RAN UE NGAP ID 1)
../lib/core/ogs-list.h:62:24: warning: invalid conversion from 'void*' to 'ogs_list_t*' {aka 'ogs_list_s*'} [-fpermissive]
../lib/core/ogs-rbtree.h:79:32: warning: invalid conversion from 'const void*' to 'const ogs_rbnode_t*' {aka 'const ogs_rbnode_s*'} [-fpermissive]
[SBI] Fix compiler error - possible uninitialized variable
[SCP] Fix compiler error - Error: this condition has identical branches
In case of additional compiler warnings turned on, the compiler warns
about potentially unused variables. Fix those issues.
I've resolved an issue where sending continuous
'PDU Session Release Request' message to the same session,
when more than two sessions were created, was causing an SMF crash.
For your reference, this problem did not occur
when only one session was created.
* [AMF/MME] UEContextReleaseCommand in Integrity (#2786)
Modified not to send UEContextReleaseCommand in Integrity Unprotected
NAS message such like Registration or Service request.
* [AMF/MME] UEContextReleaseCommand after Interity Protected (#2786)
Modified not to send UEContextReleaseCommand in Integrity Unprotected
NAS message such like Registration or Service request.
amf_ue->mac_failed flag to be cleared during security mode procedure but it was not.
At this point, the only way to cleare the amf_ue->mac_failed flag is by UE Context Release.
But I'd like to connect UEs as fast as possible without UE Context Release.
* Add "subscriber_status" cmd to open5gs-dbctl to set values for
"subscriber_status" and "operator_determined_barring" DB fields.
* Add webui View+Edit for those same fields.
* open5gs-hssd now takes those values into account and submits
Operator-Determined-Barring AVP with DB-retrieved value if
subscriber_status is set to OPERATOR_DETERMINED_BARRING.
For more information, see TS 29.272 section 5.2.2.1.3 and 7.3.30.
Tests were crashing due to AF using the wrong OpenAPI structure, while
the SBI library tried to convert a different structure to JSON.
Before the added support for nullable fields in OpenAPI documents, both
structures were identical.
There was a memory problem in the encryption using snow_3g_f8,
so AMF/MME crashed.
To solve this problem, we used the snow-3g encryption library
created as below.
https://github.com/rcatolino/libressl-snow3g
However, it seems that this library cannot be used to create
integrity hash like snow_3g_f8.
So, we decided to keep both snow-3g libraries for the time being.
1. lib/crypt/snow3g* : for INTEGRITY (NIA1, EIA1)
2. lib/crypt/openssl/snow3g* : for ENCRYPTION (NEA1, EEA1)
Scenario is handover on S1AP, data forwarding is enabled, and
the Source ENB is forwarding DL PDCP packets to EPC(SGWU)
with PDCP SN included. SGWU is also forwarding these packets
to the Target ENB.
However the PDCP SN is not present in the forwarded packets
from SGWU to Target ENB.
I modified this part, and there was the same problem in 5GC, fixed it as well.
A lot of code in GTP-U has been modified,
so if you have any problems, please let us know right away.
A situation in which you establish two sessions and release both of them.
In the first SESSION, the UE normally sent PDUSessionResourceReleaseResponse
and PDU session release complete. However, these were not sent when releasing
the second SESSION.
At this point, when the UE tried to do a deregistration,
the SMF was not properly handling the exception.
I've just fixed this.
NAS, GTP, PFCP, SBI, all except S1AP/NGAP use x1000 multiplier for Kbps, Mbps, Gbps ... etc.
From now on in WebUI all units also use a multiplier of x1000.
Sukchan Lee
Sukchan Lee
gstaa
Bostjan Meglic
Pau Espin