Browse Source

mtd: spelling fixes

Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@intel.com>
master
Brian Norris 11 years ago
committed by Artem Bityutskiy
parent
commit
92394b5c2b
  1. 2
      drivers/mtd/ftl.c
  2. 2
      drivers/mtd/inftlmount.c
  3. 4
      drivers/mtd/mtdchar.c
  4. 2
      drivers/mtd/mtdconcat.c
  5. 2
      drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c
  6. 2
      drivers/mtd/mtdswap.c
  7. 26
      drivers/mtd/nftlmount.c
  8. 16
      drivers/mtd/sm_ftl.c

2
drivers/mtd/ftl.c

@ -598,7 +598,7 @@ static int copy_erase_unit(partition_t *part, uint16_t srcunit,
unit with the fewest erases, and usually pick the data unit with
the most deleted blocks. But with a small probability, pick the
oldest data unit instead. This means that we generally postpone
the next reclaimation as long as possible, but shuffle static
the next reclamation as long as possible, but shuffle static
stuff around a bit for wear leveling.
======================================================================*/

2
drivers/mtd/inftlmount.c

@ -367,7 +367,7 @@ static int check_free_sectors(struct INFTLrecord *inftl, unsigned int address,
*
* Return: 0 when succeed, -1 on error.
*
* ToDo: 1. Is it neceressary to check_free_sector after erasing ??
* ToDo: 1. Is it necessary to check_free_sector after erasing ??
*/
int INFTL_formatblock(struct INFTLrecord *inftl, int block)
{

4
drivers/mtd/mtdchar.c

@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ static struct vfsmount *mtd_inode_mnt __read_mostly;
/*
* Data structure to hold the pointer to the mtd device as well
* as mode information ofr various use cases.
* as mode information of various use cases.
*/
struct mtd_file_info {
struct mtd_info *mtd;
@ -495,7 +495,7 @@ static int mtd_do_readoob(struct mtd_info *mtd, uint64_t start,
/*
* Copies (and truncates, if necessary) data from the larger struct,
* nand_ecclayout, to the smaller, deprecated layout struct,
* nand_ecclayout_user. This is necessary only to suppport the deprecated
* nand_ecclayout_user. This is necessary only to support the deprecated
* API ioctl ECCGETLAYOUT while allowing all new functionality to use
* nand_ecclayout flexibly (i.e. the struct may change size in new
* releases without requiring major rewrites).

2
drivers/mtd/mtdconcat.c

@ -770,7 +770,7 @@ struct mtd_info *mtd_concat_create(struct mtd_info *subdev[], /* subdevices to c
/*
* Set up the new "super" device's MTD object structure, check for
* incompatibilites between the subdevices.
* incompatibilities between the subdevices.
*/
concat->mtd.type = subdev[0]->type;
concat->mtd.flags = subdev[0]->flags;

2
drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c

@ -449,7 +449,7 @@ out_error:
* is used, see 'parse_mtd_partitions()' for more information). If none are
* found this functions tries to fallback to information specified in
* @parts/@nr_parts.
* * If any parititioning info was found, this function registers the found
* * If any partitioning info was found, this function registers the found
* partitions.
* * If no partitions were found this function just registers the MTD device
* @mtd and exits.

2
drivers/mtd/mtdswap.c

@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ struct swap_eb {
unsigned int flags;
unsigned int active_count;
unsigned int erase_count;
unsigned int pad; /* speeds up pointer decremtnt */
unsigned int pad; /* speeds up pointer decrement */
};
#define MTDSWAP_ECNT_MIN(rbroot) (rb_entry(rb_first(rbroot), struct swap_eb, \

26
drivers/mtd/nftlmount.c

@ -32,7 +32,7 @@
/* find_boot_record: Find the NFTL Media Header and its Spare copy which contains the
* various device information of the NFTL partition and Bad Unit Table. Update
* the ReplUnitTable[] table accroding to the Bad Unit Table. ReplUnitTable[]
* the ReplUnitTable[] table according to the Bad Unit Table. ReplUnitTable[]
* is used for management of Erase Unit in other routines in nftl.c and nftlmount.c
*/
static int find_boot_record(struct NFTLrecord *nftl)
@ -297,7 +297,7 @@ static int check_free_sectors(struct NFTLrecord *nftl, unsigned int address, int
*
* Return: 0 when succeed, -1 on error.
*
* ToDo: 1. Is it neceressary to check_free_sector after erasing ??
* ToDo: 1. Is it necessary to check_free_sector after erasing ??
*/
int NFTL_formatblock(struct NFTLrecord *nftl, int block)
{
@ -337,7 +337,7 @@ int NFTL_formatblock(struct NFTLrecord *nftl, int block)
nb_erases = le32_to_cpu(uci.WearInfo);
nb_erases++;
/* wrap (almost impossible with current flashs) or free block */
/* wrap (almost impossible with current flash) or free block */
if (nb_erases == 0)
nb_erases = 1;
@ -363,10 +363,10 @@ fail:
* Mark as 'IGNORE' each incorrect sector. This check is only done if the chain
* was being folded when NFTL was interrupted.
*
* The check_free_sectors in this function is neceressary. There is a possible
* The check_free_sectors in this function is necessary. There is a possible
* situation that after writing the Data area, the Block Control Information is
* not updated according (due to power failure or something) which leaves the block
* in an umconsistent state. So we have to check if a block is really FREE in this
* in an inconsistent state. So we have to check if a block is really FREE in this
* case. */
static void check_sectors_in_chain(struct NFTLrecord *nftl, unsigned int first_block)
{
@ -428,7 +428,7 @@ static int calc_chain_length(struct NFTLrecord *nftl, unsigned int first_block)
for (;;) {
length++;
/* avoid infinite loops, although this is guaranted not to
/* avoid infinite loops, although this is guaranteed not to
happen because of the previous checks */
if (length >= nftl->nb_blocks) {
printk("nftl: length too long %d !\n", length);
@ -447,11 +447,11 @@ static int calc_chain_length(struct NFTLrecord *nftl, unsigned int first_block)
/* format_chain: Format an invalid Virtual Unit chain. It frees all the Erase Units in a
* Virtual Unit Chain, i.e. all the units are disconnected.
*
* It is not stricly correct to begin from the first block of the chain because
* It is not strictly correct to begin from the first block of the chain because
* if we stop the code, we may see again a valid chain if there was a first_block
* flag in a block inside it. But is it really a problem ?
*
* FixMe: Figure out what the last statesment means. What if power failure when we are
* FixMe: Figure out what the last statement means. What if power failure when we are
* in the for (;;) loop formatting blocks ??
*/
static void format_chain(struct NFTLrecord *nftl, unsigned int first_block)
@ -485,7 +485,7 @@ static void format_chain(struct NFTLrecord *nftl, unsigned int first_block)
* totally free (only 0xff).
*
* Definition: Free Erase Unit -- A properly erased/formatted Free Erase Unit should have meet the
* following critia:
* following criteria:
* 1. */
static int check_and_mark_free_block(struct NFTLrecord *nftl, int block)
{
@ -502,7 +502,7 @@ static int check_and_mark_free_block(struct NFTLrecord *nftl, int block)
erase_mark = le16_to_cpu ((h1.EraseMark | h1.EraseMark1));
if (erase_mark != ERASE_MARK) {
/* if no erase mark, the block must be totally free. This is
possible in two cases : empty filsystem or interrupted erase (very unlikely) */
possible in two cases : empty filesystem or interrupted erase (very unlikely) */
if (check_free_sectors (nftl, block * nftl->EraseSize, nftl->EraseSize, 1) != 0)
return -1;
@ -544,7 +544,7 @@ static int check_and_mark_free_block(struct NFTLrecord *nftl, int block)
/* get_fold_mark: Read fold mark from Unit Control Information #2, we use FOLD_MARK_IN_PROGRESS
* to indicate that we are in the progression of a Virtual Unit Chain folding. If the UCI #2
* is FOLD_MARK_IN_PROGRESS when mounting the NFTL, the (previous) folding process is interrupted
* for some reason. A clean up/check of the VUC is neceressary in this case.
* for some reason. A clean up/check of the VUC is necessary in this case.
*
* WARNING: return 0 if read error
*/
@ -657,7 +657,7 @@ int NFTL_mount(struct NFTLrecord *s)
printk("Block %d: incorrect logical block: %d expected: %d\n",
block, logical_block, first_logical_block);
/* the chain is incorrect : we must format it,
but we need to read it completly */
but we need to read it completely */
do_format_chain = 1;
}
if (is_first_block) {
@ -669,7 +669,7 @@ int NFTL_mount(struct NFTLrecord *s)
printk("Block %d: incorrectly marked as first block in chain\n",
block);
/* the chain is incorrect : we must format it,
but we need to read it completly */
but we need to read it completely */
do_format_chain = 1;
} else {
printk("Block %d: folding in progress - ignoring first block flag\n",

16
drivers/mtd/sm_ftl.c

@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ module_param(debug, int, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(debug, "Debug level (0-2)");
/* ------------------- sysfs attributtes ---------------------------------- */
/* ------------------- sysfs attributes ---------------------------------- */
struct sm_sysfs_attribute {
struct device_attribute dev_attr;
char *data;
@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ static int sm_get_lba(uint8_t *lba)
/*
* Read LBA asscociated with block
* Read LBA associated with block
* returns -1, if block is erased
* returns -2 if error happens
*/
@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ static int sm_read_sector(struct sm_ftl *ftl,
return 0;
}
/* User might not need the oob, but we do for data vertification */
/* User might not need the oob, but we do for data verification */
if (!oob)
oob = &tmp_oob;
@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ again:
return ret;
}
/* Unfortunelly, oob read will _always_ succeed,
/* Unfortunately, oob read will _always_ succeed,
despite card removal..... */
ret = mtd->read_oob(mtd, sm_mkoffset(ftl, zone, block, boffset), &ops);
@ -447,14 +447,14 @@ static void sm_mark_block_bad(struct sm_ftl *ftl, int zone, int block)
/* We aren't checking the return value, because we don't care */
/* This also fails on fake xD cards, but I guess these won't expose
any bad blocks till fail completly */
any bad blocks till fail completely */
for (boffset = 0; boffset < ftl->block_size; boffset += SM_SECTOR_SIZE)
sm_write_sector(ftl, zone, block, boffset, NULL, &oob);
}
/*
* Erase a block within a zone
* If erase succedes, it updates free block fifo, otherwise marks block as bad
* If erase succeeds, it updates free block fifo, otherwise marks block as bad
*/
static int sm_erase_block(struct sm_ftl *ftl, int zone_num, uint16_t block,
int put_free)
@ -510,7 +510,7 @@ static void sm_erase_callback(struct erase_info *self)
complete(&ftl->erase_completion);
}
/* Throughtly test that block is valid. */
/* Thoroughly test that block is valid. */
static int sm_check_block(struct sm_ftl *ftl, int zone, int block)
{
int boffset;
@ -526,7 +526,7 @@ static int sm_check_block(struct sm_ftl *ftl, int zone, int block)
for (boffset = 0; boffset < ftl->block_size;
boffset += SM_SECTOR_SIZE) {
/* This shoudn't happen anyway */
/* This shouldn't happen anyway */
if (sm_read_sector(ftl, zone, block, boffset, NULL, &oob))
return -2;

Loading…
Cancel
Save