CONFIG_SPL_ABORT_ON_RAW_IMAGE causes SPL to abort and move on when it
encounters RAW images, express this same functionality as a positive
option enabling support for RAW images: CONFIG_SPL_RAW_IMAGE_SUPPORT
Also move uses of this to defconfigs.
Signed-off-by: Andrew F. Davis <afd@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
[trini: Rework Kconfig logic a little, move to common/spl/Kconfig]
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
At present malloc_base/_limit/_ptr are not initialised in spl_init() when
we call spl_init() in board_init_f(). This is due to a recent change aimed
at avoiding overwriting the malloc area set up on some boards by
spl_relocate_stack_gd().
However if CONFIG_SPL_STACK_R_MALLOC_SIMPLE_LEN is not defined, we now
skip setting up the memory area in spl_init() which is obviously wrong.
To fix this, add a new function spl_early_init() which can be called in
board_init_f().
Fixes: b3d2861e (spl: Remove overwrite of relocated malloc limit)
Signed-off-by: Eddie Cai <eddie.cai.linux@gmail.com>
Rewrote spl_{,early_}init() to avoid duplicate code:
Rewrite/expand commit message:
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Eddie Cai <eddie.cai.linux@gmail.com>
This reverts commit 8c36e99f21.
There is misunderstanding in commit 8c36e99f21 ("armv8: release
slave cores from CPU_RELEASE_ADDR"). How to bring the slave cores
into U-Boot proper is platform-specific. So, it should be cared
in SoC/board files instead of common/spl/spl.c. As you see SPL
is the acronym of Secondary Program Loader, there is generally
something that runs before SPL (the First one is usually Boot ROM).
How to wake up slave cores from the Boot ROM is really SoC specific.
So, the intention for the spin table support is to bring the slave
cores into U-Boot proper in an SoC specific manner. (this must be
done after relocation. see below.)
If you bring the slaves into SPL, it is SoC own code responsibility
to transfer them to U-Boot proper. The Spin Table defines the
interface between a boot-loader and Linux kernel. It is unrelated
to the interface between SPL and U-Boot proper.
One more thing is missing in the commit; spl_image->entry_point
points to the entry address of U-Boot *before* relocation. U-Boot
relocates itself between board_init_f() and board_init_r(). This
means the master CPU sees the different copy of the spin code than
the slave CPUs enter. The spin_table_update_dt() protects the code
*after* relocation. As a result, the slave CPUs spin in unprotected
code, which leads to unstable behavior.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
spl_init on some boards is called after stack and heap relocation, on
some platforms spl_relocate_stack_gd is called to handle setting the
limit to its value CONFIG_SPL_STACK_R_MALLOC_SIMPLE_LEN when simple
SPL malloc is enabled during relocation. spl_init should then not
re-assign the old pre-relocation limit when this is defined.
Signed-off-by: Andrew F. Davis <afd@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
When using ARMv8 with ARMV8_SPIN_TABLE=y, we want the slave cores to
wait on spin_table_cpu_release_addr, until the Linux kernel will "wake" them
by writing to that location. The address of spin_table_cpu_release_addr is
transferred to the kernel using the device tree that is updated by
spin_table_update_dt().
However, if we also use SPL, then the slave cores are stuck at
CPU_RELEASE_ADDR instead and as a result, never wake up.
This patch releases the slave cores by writing spl_image->entry_point to
CPU_RELEASE_ADDR location before the end of the SPL code
(at jump_to_image_no_args()).
That way, the slave cores will start to execute the u-boot and will get to
the spin-table code and wait on the correct address
(spin_table_cpu_release_addr).
Signed-off-by: Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay@gmail.com>
Cc: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Add a new top-level config option so support booting an image stored
in RAM. This allows to move the RAM boot support into a sparate file
and having a single condition to compile that file.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan.agner@toradex.com>
There is no CONFIG_OF_PLATDATA, only CONFIG_SPL_OF_PLATDATA, so rename
the two references to CONFIG_OF_PLATDATA to CONFIG_SPL_OF_PLATDATA.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Since entry_point and load_addr are addresses, they should be
represented as longs to cover the whole address space and to avoid
warning when compiling the SPL in 64-bit.
Also adjust debug prints to add the 'l' specifier, where needed.
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Reviewed-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@openedev.com>
Create a boot_from_devices() function to handle trying each device. This
helps to reduce the size of the already-large board_init_r() function.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
It is useful to name each method so that we can print out this name when
using the method. Currently this happens using a separate function. In
preparation for unifying this, add a name to each method.
The name is only available if we have libcommon support (i.e can use
printf()).
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
When CONFIG_SPL_STACK_R is enabled, and spl_init() is called before
board_init_r(), spl_relocate_stack_gd() will move global_data to a new
place in memory. This affects driver model since it uses a list for the
uclasses. Unless this is updated the list will become invalid. When
looking for a non-existent uclass, such as when adding a new one, the loop
in uclass_find() may continue forever, thus causing a hang.
Add a function to correct this rather obscure bug.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Some devices (e.g. dra7xx) support loading to RAM using DFU without
having direct boot from RAM support. Make sure the linker list
does not contain BOOT_DEVICE_RAM if CONFIG_SPL_RAM_DEVICE is not
enabled.
Fixes: 98136b2f26 ("spl: Convert spl_ram_load_image() to use linker list")
Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan.agner@toradex.com>
Acked-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
There is no need for this to be in the BSS region. By moving it we can delay
use of BSS in SPL. This is useful for machines where the BSS region is not
in writeable space. On 64-bit x86, SPL runs from SPI flash and it is easier
to eliminate BSS use than link SPL to run with BSS at a particular
cache-as-RAM (CAR) address.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Rather than having a global variable, pass the spl_image as a parameter.
This avoids BSS use, and makes it clearer what the function is actually
doing.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Add a linker list declaration for this method and remove the explicit
switch() code. Update existing users.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Add a linker list declaration for this method and remove the explicit
switch() code. We need two variants - one for BOOT_DEVICE_CPGMAC and one for
BOOT_DEVICE_USBETH.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Add a linker list declaration for this method and remove the explicit
switch() code. Also set up the sunxi function.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Add a linker list declaration for this method and remove the explicit
switch() code.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Add a linker list declaration for this method and remove the explicit
switch() code.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Add a linker list declaration for this method and remove the explicit
switch() code.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Add a linker list declaration for this method and remove the explicit
switch() code.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Add a linker list declaration for this method and remove the explicit
switch() code.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Add a linker list declaration for this method and remove the explicit
switch() code.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Add a linker list declaration for this method and remove the explicit
switch() code.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Add a linker list declaration for this method and remove the explicit
switch() code.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Add a linker list declaration for this method and remove the explicit
switch() code.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
[trini: Include updating the DFU case]
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Add a linker list macro which can be used to declare an SPL image loader.
Update spl_load_image() to search available loaders for the correct one.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
At present some spl_xxx_load_image() functions take a parameter and some
don't. Of those that do, most take an integer but one takes a string.
Convert this parameter into a struct so that we can pass all functions the
same thing. This will allow us to use a common function signature.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Instead of using the global spl_image variable, pass the required struct in
as an argument.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Instead of using the global spl_image variable, pass the required struct in
as an argument.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Rather than act on the global variable, pass the required struct in as a
parameter.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
This reworks spl_set_header_raw_uboot to allow having both os boot
(which comes with a valid header) and aborting when no valid header is
found (thus excluding raw u-boot.bin images).
Signed-off-by: Paul Kocialkowski <contact@paulk.fr>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Other payload than uImage is currently considered to be raw U-Boot
image. Check also for zImage in Falcon mode.
Signed-off-by: Ladislav Michl <ladis@linux-mips.org>
Reviewed-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
Add support for loading from UBI volumes on the top of NAND
and OneNAND.
Signed-off-by: Ladislav Michl <ladis@linux-mips.org>
Reviewed-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
Allwinner devices support SPI flash as one of the possible
bootable media type. The SPI flash chip needs to be connected
to SPI0 pins (port C) to make this work. More information is
available at:
https://linux-sunxi.org/Bootable_SPI_flash
This patch adds the initial support for booting from SPI flash.
The existing SPI frameworks are not used in order to reduce the
SPL code size. Right now the SPL size grows by ~370 bytes when
CONFIG_SPL_SPI_SUNXI option is enabled.
While there are no popular Allwinner devices with SPI flash at
the moment, testing can be done using a SPI flash module (it
can be bought for ~2$ on ebay) and jumper wires with the boards,
which expose relevant pins on the expansion header. The SPI flash
chips themselves are very cheap (some prices are even listed as
low as 4 cents) and should not cost much if somebody decides to
design a development board with an SPI flash chip soldered on
the PCB.
Another nice feature of the SPI flash is that it can be safely
accessed in a device-independent way (since we know that the
boot ROM is already probing these pins during the boot time).
And if, for example, Olimex boards opted to use SPI flash instead
of EEPROM, then they would have been able to have U-Boot installed
in the SPI flash now and boot the rest of the system from the SATA
hard drive. Hopefully we may see new interesting Allwinner based
development boards in the future, now that the software support
for the SPI flash is in a better shape :-)
Testing can be done by enabling the CONFIG_SPL_SPI_SUNXI option
in a board defconfig, then building U-Boot and finally flashing
the resulting u-boot-sunxi-with-spl.bin binary over USB OTG with
a help of the sunxi-fel tool:
sunxi-fel spiflash-write 0 u-boot-sunxi-with-spl.bin
The device needs to be switched into FEL (USB recovery) mode first.
The most suitable boards for testing are Orange Pi PC and Pine64.
Because these boards are cheap, have no built-in NAND/eMMC and
expose SPI0 pins on the Raspberry Pi compatible expansion header.
The A13-OLinuXino-Micro board also can be used.
Signed-off-by: Siarhei Siamashka <siarhei.siamashka@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
When CONFIG_OF_PLATDATA is enabled, we cannot use the u-boot,dm-pre-reloc
device tree property since the device tree is not available. However,
dt-platdata.c only includes devices which would have been present in the
device tree, and we can assume that all such devices are needed for SPL.
If they were not needed, they would have been omitted to save space.
So in this case, bind all devices regardless of the u-boot,dm-pre-reloc
setting. This avoids needing to add a DM_FLAG_PRE_RELOC to every driver,
thus affecting U-Boot proper also.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Allow configuring the begining of the malloc_f area in SPL.
This patch uses the same CONFIG_MALLOC_F_ADDR established by
the sandbox.
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Cc: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Cc: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Remove the check for GD_FLG_SPL_INIT in spl_relocate_stack_gd().
The check will always fail. This is because spl_relocate_stack_gd()
is called from ARM's crt0.S and it is called before board_init_r().
The board_init_r() calls spl_init(), which sets the GD_FLG_SPL_INIT
flag.
Note that reserving the malloc area in RAM is not a problem even
if the GD_FLG_SPL_INIT flag is not set.
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Cc: Chin Liang See <clsee@altera.com>
Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@opensource.altera.com>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@denx.de>
Cc: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Support loading FIT in SPL for RAM bootmode.
CONFIG_SPL_LOAD_FIT_ADRESS points to address where FIT image is stored
in memory.
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
Call this function before passing control from SPL.
For fpga case it is necessary to enable for example level shifters
when bitstream is programmed.
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Andrew F. Davis
Eddie Cai
Masahiro Yamada
Oded Gabbay
Stefan Agner
Tom Rini
Andre Przywara
Simon Glass
B, Ravi
Paul Kocialkowski
Ladislav Michl
Siarhei Siamashka
Heiko Schocher
Marek Vasut
Michal Simek