There are various usages of ALLOW_EMPTY with no packages specified. This
is not recommended syntax, nor is it likely to be supported in the future.
This patch improves the references in OE-Core, either removing them if they're
pointless (e.g. when PACKAGES="") or specifying which package it applies to.
(From OE-Core rev: fe81bd4f600877e63433184cfc2e22c33bb77db6)
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Currently, do_rootfs has a dependency on all the do_package output being present
due to its usage of the pkgdata directories. This means that if you run:
bitbake xxxx-image -c rootfs
you end up having to fetch and unpack all the do_package data which is usually
large and inefficient. It also means rm_work has to leave all the do_package
data lying around so rootfs works.
This patch splits the actual creation of the pkgdata directory off into a separate
task, "packagedata" which happens immediately after do_package. We can then remap
the dependencies so this task is depended upon, not do_package. Sstate can then be
programmed not to require do_package at the appropriate times.
Whilst this patch doesn't do so, it opens the possibility of rm_work wiping
out the do_package output from WORKDIR as long as it also removed the do_package
stamp (both normal and setscene variants) and allowing more space savings
with rm_work which has been regularly requested.
(From OE-Core rev: 6107ee294afde395e39d084c33e8e94013c625a9)
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Export PYTHONHOME to ${STAGING_DIR_NATIVE}/usr. In this way python will search
for modules in native sysroot.
[YOCTO #2134]
(From OE-Core rev: 230b235329bcaca1a95afd89801d28768aff483b)
Signed-off-by: Andrei Gherzan <andrei@gherzan.ro>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
[YOCTO #1024]
Currently package-index.bb only supports ipk. This commit adds the support
for rpm and deb, too.
------------------------------
How to generate and use repos:
1) run "bitbake package-index" after building some target,
e.g., core-image-sato-sdk;
2) export ${DEPLOY_DIR_RPM}, ${DEPLOY_DIR_IPK} and ${DEPLOY_DIR_DEB} by a
webserver on the host, assuming the host IP is 192.168.7.1, at
http://192.168.7.1/rpmhttp://192.168.7.1/ipkhttp://192.168.7.1/deb
3) inside the target, according to the packaging system (rpm, ipk or deb) used
when we generate the target image, we can use different ways to manage
packages:
3.1) RPM
run "zypper addrepo http://192.168.7.1/rpm main; zypper refresh"
to retrieve info about the repo; next, we can use "zypper install/remove"
to manage packages.
3.2) IPK
add the repo info into opkg config file, i.e., in
/etc/opkg/arch.conf, we can add something like
"src i586 http://192.168.7.1/ipk/i586", and next, we run "opkg update" to
make opkg update the list of available packages. And later, we can use
"opkg install/remove" to manage packages.
3.3) DEB
Currently in target, some important config files, like
/var/lib/dpkg/status and /etc/apt/sources.list, for deb/apt are missing. So
we can't install/remove package in target at present.
(From OE-Core rev: 01e34bdb43e0cc27c1cfffd6730c384f40c404c1)
Signed-off-by: Dexuan Cui <dexuan.cui@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
This is the next stage of recipe reorganization, in this stage
many recipes where moved to a new meta-demoapps layer since this
is more appropriate for demo usage then the core. Additional some
recipes were moved to meta-extras to indicate they may be depercated
at a future time.
A number of recipes were modified since dependencies need to be
corrected.
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <Saul.Wold@intel.com>
Richard Purdie
Andrei Gherzan
Dexuan Cui
Lianhao Lu
Richard Purdie
Saul Wold