squashfs: fix CVE-2012-4025

CQID:WIND00366813 Reference: http://squashfs.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi? p=squashfs/squashfs;a=patch;h=8515b3d420f502c5c0236b86e2d6d7e3b23c190e Integer overflow in the queue_init function in unsquashfs.c in unsquashfs in Squashfs 4.2 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted block_log field in the superblock of a .sqsh file, leading to a heap-based buffer overflow. http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2012-4025 (From OE-Core rev: bb1611d4830bb7aff2371afdb2a77a4ca7298c7d) Signed-off-by: yanjun.zhu <yanjun.zhu@windriver.com> [YOCTO #3564] Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
2012-12-11 18:00:32 +08:00 · 2012-12-11 18:00:32 +08:00 · 5b3ffcea5e
parent f023d05898
commit 5b3ffcea5e
4 changed files with 447 additions and 1 deletions
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/squashfs-tools/patches/squashfs-4.2-fix-CVE-2012-4025.patch
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/squashfs-tools/patches/squashfs-4.2-fix-CVE-2012-4025.patch
@ -0,0 +1,190 @@
+Upstream-Status: Backport
+
+Reference: http://squashfs.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?
+p=squashfs/squashfs;a=patch;h=8515b3d420f502c5c0236b86e2d6d7e3b23c190e
+
+Integer overflow in the queue_init function in unsquashfs.c in
+unsquashfs in Squashfs 4.2 and earlier allows remote attackers
+to execute arbitrary code via a crafted block_log field in the
+superblock of a .sqsh file, leading to a heap-based buffer overflow.
+
+http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2012-4025
+
+Signed-off-by: yanjun.zhu <yanjun.zhu@windriver.com> 
+
+--- a/unsquashfs.c	2012-11-30 17:57:57.000000000 +0800
+++ b/unsquashfs.c	2012-11-30 17:58:09.000000000 +0800
+@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
+ #include <sys/types.h>
+ #include <sys/time.h>
+ #include <sys/resource.h>
+#include <limits.h>
+ 
+ struct cache *fragment_cache, *data_cache;
+ struct queue *to_reader, *to_deflate, *to_writer, *from_writer;
+@@ -138,6 +139,24 @@ void sigalrm_handler()
+ }
+ 
+ 
+int add_overflow(int a, int b)
+{
+	return (INT_MAX - a) < b;
+}
+
+
+int shift_overflow(int a, int shift)
+{
+	return (INT_MAX >> shift) < a;
+}
+
+ 
+int multiply_overflow(int a, int multiplier)
+{
+	return (INT_MAX / multiplier) < a;
+}
+
+
+ struct queue *queue_init(int size)
+ {
+ 	struct queue *queue = malloc(sizeof(struct queue));
+@@ -145,6 +164,10 @@ struct queue *queue_init(int size)
+ 	if(queue == NULL)
+ 		EXIT_UNSQUASH("Out of memory in queue_init\n");
+ 
+	if(add_overflow(size, 1) ||
+				multiply_overflow(size + 1, sizeof(void *)))
+		EXIT_UNSQUASH("Size too large in queue_init\n");
+
+ 	queue->data = malloc(sizeof(void *) * (size + 1));
+ 	if(queue->data == NULL)
+ 		EXIT_UNSQUASH("Out of memory in queue_init\n");
+@@ -1948,13 +1971,30 @@ void initialise_threads(int fragment_buf
+ 	 * allocate to_reader, to_deflate and to_writer queues.  Set based on
+ 	 * open file limit and cache size, unless open file limit is unlimited,
+ 	 * in which case set purely based on cache limits
+	 *
+	 * In doing so, check that the user supplied values do not overflow
+	 * a signed int
+ 	 */
+ 	if (max_files != -1) {
+		if(add_overflow(data_buffer_size, max_files) ||
+				add_overflow(data_buffer_size, max_files * 2))
+			EXIT_UNSQUASH("Data queue size is too large\n");
+
+ 		to_reader = queue_init(max_files + data_buffer_size);
+ 		to_deflate = queue_init(max_files + data_buffer_size);
+ 		to_writer = queue_init(max_files * 2 + data_buffer_size);
+ 	} else {
+-		int all_buffers_size = fragment_buffer_size + data_buffer_size;
+		int all_buffers_size;
+
+		if(add_overflow(fragment_buffer_size, data_buffer_size))
+			EXIT_UNSQUASH("Data and fragment queues combined are"
+							" too large\n");
+
+		all_buffers_size = fragment_buffer_size + data_buffer_size;
+
+		if(add_overflow(all_buffers_size, all_buffers_size))
+			EXIT_UNSQUASH("Data and fragment queues combined are"
+							" too large\n");
+ 
+ 		to_reader = queue_init(all_buffers_size);
+ 		to_deflate = queue_init(all_buffers_size);
+@@ -2059,6 +2099,32 @@ void progress_bar(long long current, lon
+ }
+ 
+ 
+int parse_number(char *arg, int *res)
+{
+	char *b;
+	long number = strtol(arg, &b, 10);
+
+	/* check for trailing junk after number */
+	if(*b != '\0')
+		return 0;
+
+	/* check for strtol underflow or overflow in conversion */
+	if(number == LONG_MIN || number == LONG_MAX)
+		return 0;
+
+	/* reject negative numbers as invalid */
+	if(number < 0)
+		return 0;
+
+	/* check if long result will overflow signed int */
+	if(number > INT_MAX)
+		return 0;
+
+	*res = number;
+	return 1;
+}
+
+
+ #define VERSION() \
+ 	printf("unsquashfs version 4.2 (2011/02/28)\n");\
+ 	printf("copyright (C) 2011 Phillip Lougher "\
+@@ -2140,8 +2206,8 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
+ 		} else if(strcmp(argv[i], "-data-queue") == 0 ||
+ 					 strcmp(argv[i], "-da") == 0) {
+ 			if((++i == argc) ||
+-					(data_buffer_size = strtol(argv[i], &b,
+-					 10), *b != '\0')) {
+					!parse_number(argv[i],
+						&data_buffer_size)) {
+ 				ERROR("%s: -data-queue missing or invalid "
+ 					"queue size\n", argv[0]);
+ 				exit(1);
+@@ -2154,8 +2220,8 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
+ 		} else if(strcmp(argv[i], "-frag-queue") == 0 ||
+ 					strcmp(argv[i], "-fr") == 0) {
+ 			if((++i == argc) ||
+-					(fragment_buffer_size = strtol(argv[i],
+-					 &b, 10), *b != '\0')) {
+					!parse_number(argv[i],
+						&fragment_buffer_size)) {
+ 				ERROR("%s: -frag-queue missing or invalid "
+ 					"queue size\n", argv[0]);
+ 				exit(1);
+@@ -2280,11 +2346,39 @@ options:
+ 	block_log = sBlk.s.block_log;
+ 
+ 	/*
+	 * Sanity check block size and block log.
+	 *
+	 * Check they're within correct limits
+	 */
+	if(block_size > SQUASHFS_FILE_MAX_SIZE ||
+					block_log > SQUASHFS_FILE_MAX_LOG)
+		EXIT_UNSQUASH("Block size or block_log too large."
+			"  File system is corrupt.\n");
+
+	/*
+	 * Check block_size and block_log match
+	 */
+	if(block_size != (1 << block_log))
+		EXIT_UNSQUASH("Block size and block_log do not match."
+			"  File system is corrupt.\n");
+
+	/*
+ 	 * convert from queue size in Mbytes to queue size in
+-	 * blocks
+	 * blocks.
+	 *
+	 * In doing so, check that the user supplied values do not
+	 * overflow a signed int
+ 	 */
+-	fragment_buffer_size <<= 20 - block_log;
+-	data_buffer_size <<= 20 - block_log;
+	if(shift_overflow(fragment_buffer_size, 20 - block_log))
+		EXIT_UNSQUASH("Fragment queue size is too large\n");
+	else
+		fragment_buffer_size <<= 20 - block_log;
+
+	if(shift_overflow(data_buffer_size, 20 - block_log))
+		EXIT_UNSQUASH("Data queue size is too large\n");
+	else
+		data_buffer_size <<= 20 - block_log;
+
+ 	initialise_threads(fragment_buffer_size, data_buffer_size);
+ 
+ 	fragment_data = malloc(block_size);
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/squashfs-tools/patches/squashfs-add-a-commment-and-fix-some-other-comments.patch
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/squashfs-tools/patches/squashfs-add-a-commment-and-fix-some-other-comments.patch
@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+Upstream-Status: Backport
+
+unsquashfs: add a commment and fix some other comments
+
+Signed-off-by: yanjun.zhu <yanjun.zhu@windriver.com> 
+
+diff -urpN a/unsquashfs.c b/unsquashfs.c
+--- a/unsquashfs.c	2012-11-30 15:27:14.000000000 +0800
+++ b/unsquashfs.c	2012-11-30 15:27:56.000000000 +0800
+@@ -814,7 +814,7 @@ int write_file(struct inode *inode, char
+ 
+ 	/*
+ 	 * the writer thread is queued a squashfs_file structure describing the
+- 	 * file.  If the file has one or more blocks or a fragments they are
+ 	 * file.  If the file has one or more blocks or a fragment they are
+  	 * queued separately (references to blocks in the cache).
+  	 */
+ 	file->fd = file_fd;
+@@ -838,7 +838,7 @@ int write_file(struct inode *inode, char
+ 		block->offset = 0;
+ 		block->size = i == file_end ? inode->data & (block_size - 1) :
+ 			block_size;
+-		if(block_list[i] == 0) /* sparse file */
+		if(block_list[i] == 0) /* sparse block */
+ 			block->buffer = NULL;
+ 		else {
+ 			block->buffer = cache_get(data_cache, start,
+@@ -2161,6 +2161,10 @@ options:
+ 	block_size = sBlk.s.block_size;
+ 	block_log = sBlk.s.block_log;
+ 
+	/*
+	 * convert from queue size in Mbytes to queue size in
+	 * blocks
+	 */
+ 	fragment_buffer_size <<= 20 - block_log;
+ 	data_buffer_size <<= 20 - block_log;
+ 	initialise_threads(fragment_buffer_size, data_buffer_size);
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/squashfs-tools/patches/squashfs-fix-open-file-limit.patch
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/squashfs-tools/patches/squashfs-fix-open-file-limit.patch
@ -0,0 +1,215 @@
+Upstream-Status: Backport
+
+unsquashfs: fix open file limit
+
+Previously Unsquashfs relied on the to_writer queue being
+set to 1000 to limit the amount of open file read-ahead to a
+maximum of 500.  For the default process limit of 1024 open files
+this was perhaps acceptable, but it obviously breaks if ulimit has
+been used to set the open file limit to below 504 (this includes
+stdin, stdout, stderr and the Squashfs filesystem being unsquashed).
+
+More importantly setting the to_writer queue to 1000 to limit
+the amount of files open has always been an inherent performance
+hit because the to_writer queue queues blocks.  It limits the
+block readhead to 1000 blocks, irrespective of how many files
+that represents.  A single file containing more than 1000 blocks
+will still be limited to a 1000 block readahead even though the
+data block cache typically can buffer more than this (at the
+default data cache size of 256 Mbytes and the default block size
+of 128 Kbytes, it can buffer 2048 blocks).  Obviously the
+caches serve more than just a read-ahead role (they also
+cache decompressed blocks in case they're referenced later e.g.
+by duplicate files), but the artificial limit imposed on
+the read-ahead due to setting the to_writer queue to 1000 is
+unnecessary.
+
+This commit does away with the need to limit the to_writer queue,
+by introducing open_wait() and close_wake() calls which correctly
+track the amount of open files.
+
+Signed-off-by: Phillip Lougher <phillip@squashfs.org.uk>
+
+Signed-off-by: yanjun.zhu <yanjun.zhu@windriver.com> 
+
+diff -urpN a/unsquashfs.c b/unsquashfs.c
+--- a/unsquashfs.c	2012-11-30 15:31:29.000000000 +0800
+++ b/unsquashfs.c	2012-11-30 15:32:03.000000000 +0800
+@@ -31,6 +31,8 @@
+ 
+ #include <sys/sysinfo.h>
+ #include <sys/types.h>
+#include <sys/time.h>
+#include <sys/resource.h>
+ 
+ struct cache *fragment_cache, *data_cache;
+ struct queue *to_reader, *to_deflate, *to_writer, *from_writer;
+@@ -784,6 +786,46 @@ failure:
+ }
+ 
+ 
+pthread_mutex_t open_mutex = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER;
+pthread_cond_t open_empty = PTHREAD_COND_INITIALIZER;
+int open_unlimited, open_count;
+#define OPEN_FILE_MARGIN 10
+
+
+void open_init(int count)
+{
+	open_count = count;
+	open_unlimited = count == -1;
+}
+
+
+int open_wait(char *pathname, int flags, mode_t mode)
+{
+	if (!open_unlimited) {
+		pthread_mutex_lock(&open_mutex);
+		while (open_count == 0)
+			pthread_cond_wait(&open_empty, &open_mutex);
+		open_count --;
+		pthread_mutex_unlock(&open_mutex);
+	}
+
+	return open(pathname, flags, mode);
+}
+
+
+void close_wake(int fd)
+{
+	close(fd);
+
+	if (!open_unlimited) {
+		pthread_mutex_lock(&open_mutex);
+		open_count ++;
+		pthread_cond_signal(&open_empty);
+		pthread_mutex_unlock(&open_mutex);
+	}
+}
+
+
+ int write_file(struct inode *inode, char *pathname)
+ {
+ 	unsigned int file_fd, i;
+@@ -794,8 +836,8 @@ int write_file(struct inode *inode, char
+ 
+ 	TRACE("write_file: regular file, blocks %d\n", inode->blocks);
+ 
+-	file_fd = open(pathname, O_CREAT | O_WRONLY | (force ? O_TRUNC : 0),
+-		(mode_t) inode->mode & 0777);
+	file_fd = open_wait(pathname, O_CREAT | O_WRONLY |
+		(force ? O_TRUNC : 0), (mode_t) inode->mode & 0777);
+ 	if(file_fd == -1) {
+ 		ERROR("write_file: failed to create file %s, because %s\n",
+ 			pathname, strerror(errno));
+@@ -1712,7 +1754,7 @@ void *writer(void *arg)
+ 			}
+ 		}
+ 
+-		close(file_fd);
+		close_wake(file_fd);
+ 		if(failed == FALSE)
+ 			set_attributes(file->pathname, file->mode, file->uid,
+ 				file->gid, file->time, file->xattr, force);
+@@ -1803,9 +1845,9 @@ void *progress_thread(void *arg)
+ 
+ void initialise_threads(int fragment_buffer_size, int data_buffer_size)
+ {
+-	int i;
+	struct rlimit rlim;
+	int i, max_files, res;
+ 	sigset_t sigmask, old_mask;
+-	int all_buffers_size = fragment_buffer_size + data_buffer_size;
+ 
+ 	sigemptyset(&sigmask);
+ 	sigaddset(&sigmask, SIGINT);
+@@ -1841,10 +1883,86 @@ void initialise_threads(int fragment_buf
+ 		EXIT_UNSQUASH("Out of memory allocating thread descriptors\n");
+ 	deflator_thread = &thread[3];
+ 
+-	to_reader = queue_init(all_buffers_size);
+-	to_deflate = queue_init(all_buffers_size);
+-	to_writer = queue_init(1000);
+	/*
+	 * dimensioning the to_reader and to_deflate queues.  The size of
+	 * these queues is directly related to the amount of block
+	 * read-ahead possible.  To_reader queues block read requests to
+	 * the reader thread and to_deflate queues block decompression
+	 * requests to the deflate thread(s) (once the block has been read by
+	 * the reader thread).  The amount of read-ahead is determined by
+	 * the combined size of the data_block and fragment caches which
+	 * determine the total number of blocks which can be "in flight"
+	 * at any one time (either being read or being decompressed)
+	 *
+	 * The maximum file open limit, however, affects the read-ahead
+	 * possible, in that for normal sizes of the fragment and data block
+	 * caches, where the incoming files have few data blocks or one fragment
+	 * only, the file open limit is likely to be reached before the
+	 * caches are full.  This means the worst case sizing of the combined
+	 * sizes of the caches is unlikely to ever be necessary.  However, is is
+	 * obvious read-ahead up to the data block cache size is always possible
+	 * irrespective of the file open limit, because a single file could
+	 * contain that number of blocks.
+	 *
+	 * Choosing the size as "file open limit + data block cache size" seems
+	 * to be a reasonable estimate.  We can reasonably assume the maximum
+	 * likely read-ahead possible is data block cache size + one fragment
+	 * per open file.
+	 *
+	 * dimensioning the to_writer queue.  The size of this queue is
+	 * directly related to the amount of block read-ahead possible.
+	 * However, unlike the to_reader and to_deflate queues, this is
+	 * complicated by the fact the to_writer queue not only contains
+	 * entries for fragments and data_blocks but it also contains
+	 * file entries, one per open file in the read-ahead.
+	 *
+	 * Choosing the size as "2 * (file open limit) +
+	 * data block cache size" seems to be a reasonable estimate.
+	 * We can reasonably assume the maximum likely read-ahead possible
+	 * is data block cache size + one fragment per open file, and then
+	 * we will have a file_entry for each open file.
+	 */
+	res = getrlimit(RLIMIT_NOFILE, &rlim);
+	if (res == -1) {
+		ERROR("failed to get open file limit!  Defaulting to 1\n");
+		rlim.rlim_cur = 1;
+	}
+
+	if (rlim.rlim_cur != RLIM_INFINITY) {
+		/*
+		 * leave OPEN_FILE_MARGIN free (rlim_cur includes fds used by
+		 * stdin, stdout, stderr and filesystem fd
+		 */
+		if (rlim.rlim_cur <= OPEN_FILE_MARGIN)
+			/* no margin, use minimum possible */
+			max_files = 1;
+		else
+			max_files = rlim.rlim_cur - OPEN_FILE_MARGIN;
+	} else
+		max_files = -1;
+
+	/* set amount of available files for use by open_wait and close_wake */
+	open_init(max_files);
+
+	/*
+	 * allocate to_reader, to_deflate and to_writer queues.  Set based on
+	 * open file limit and cache size, unless open file limit is unlimited,
+	 * in which case set purely based on cache limits
+	 */
+	if (max_files != -1) {
+		to_reader = queue_init(max_files + data_buffer_size);
+		to_deflate = queue_init(max_files + data_buffer_size);
+		to_writer = queue_init(max_files * 2 + data_buffer_size);
+	} else {
+		int all_buffers_size = fragment_buffer_size + data_buffer_size;
+
+		to_reader = queue_init(all_buffers_size);
+		to_deflate = queue_init(all_buffers_size);
+		to_writer = queue_init(all_buffers_size * 2);
+	}
+
+ 	from_writer = queue_init(1);
+
+ 	fragment_cache = cache_init(block_size, fragment_buffer_size);
+ 	data_cache = cache_init(block_size, data_buffer_size);
+ 	pthread_create(&thread[0], NULL, reader, NULL);
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/squashfs-tools/squashfs-tools_4.2.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/squashfs-tools/squashfs-tools_4.2.bb
@ -8,12 +8,15 @@ LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://../COPYING;md5=0636e73ff0215e8d672dc4c32c317bb3 \
                    file://../../7zC.txt;beginline=12;endline=16;md5=2056cd6d919ebc3807602143c7449a7c \
                   "
 DEPENDS = "attr zlib xz"
-PR = "1"
+PR = "r2"

 SRC_URI = "${SOURCEFORGE_MIRROR}/squashfs/squashfs${PV}.tar.gz;name=squashfs \
           http://downloads.sourceforge.net/sevenzip/lzma465.tar.bz2;name=lzma \
          "
 SRC_URI += "file://squashfs-4.2-fix-CVE-2012-4024.patch \
+            file://squashfs-add-a-commment-and-fix-some-other-comments.patch \
+            file://squashfs-fix-open-file-limit.patch \
+            file://squashfs-4.2-fix-CVE-2012-4025.patch \
           " 
 SRC_URI[squashfs.md5sum] = "1b7a781fb4cf8938842279bd3e8ee852"
 SRC_URI[squashfs.sha256sum] = "d9e0195aa922dbb665ed322b9aaa96e04a476ee650f39bbeadb0d00b24022e96"