recipe_sanity: Don't bother checking LICENSE

Since e3d7890cac or so, base.bbclass has
considered invalid LICENSE settings to be a fatal error.  This means we
will never see them so there is no point checking for that.

(From OE-Core rev: e2d71503847f72f55666143a2a320925838fd26f)

Signed-off-by: Phil Blundell <philb@gnu.org>
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Phil Blundell 2012-10-01 17:03:04 +01:00 committed by Richard Purdie
parent 36d4dcfe6a
commit 2b5acdc0bc
1 changed files with 2 additions and 7 deletions

View File

@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ def bad_runtime_vars(cfgdata, d):
__note("%s should be %s_${PN}" % (var, var), d)
__recipe_sanity_reqvars = "DESCRIPTION"
__recipe_sanity_reqdiffvars = "LICENSE"
__recipe_sanity_reqdiffvars = ""
def req_vars(cfgdata, d):
for var in d.getVar("__recipe_sanity_reqvars", True).split():
if not d.getVar(var, 0):
@ -23,11 +23,6 @@ def req_vars(cfgdata, d):
val = d.getVar(var, 0)
cfgval = cfgdata.get(var)
# Hardcoding is bad, but I'm lazy. We don't care about license being
# unset if the recipe has no sources!
if var == "LICENSE" and d.getVar("SRC_URI", True) == cfgdata.get("SRC_URI"):
continue
if not val:
__note("%s should be set" % var, d)
elif val == cfgval:
@ -93,7 +88,7 @@ def can_remove_FILESDIR(cfgdata, d):
expanded == d.expand(expected))
def can_remove_others(p, cfgdata, d):
for k in ["S", "PV", "PN", "DESCRIPTION", "LICENSE", "DEPENDS",
for k in ["S", "PV", "PN", "DESCRIPTION", "DEPENDS",
"SECTION", "PACKAGES", "EXTRA_OECONF", "EXTRA_OEMAKE"]:
#for k in cfgdata:
unexpanded = d.getVar(k, 0)