The test `test_balanced_exchanges_gain_loss`
failed on Jun 6, because it created a specific rate
for today's date at midnight
(e.g. on Jun 6, 201x-06-06 00:00:00) for the test purpose,
but a rate is created in the demo data for Jun 6 midnight exactly:
`base.rateUSDbis`, making the test confused about which rate
to use.
We solve this by making the test use the rate `base.rateUSDbis`,
modifying the rate for its own need, instead of creating a new
rate.
When processing the reconciliation of invoices with bank statements
in foreign currencies, this is possible that there is a cent of difference,
due to the fact
the sum of amount exchanged could not be equal to the exchanged
sum of amount received.
For instance,
with a company in EUR as currency,
with a rate of 0.033 for USD,
with an invoice of 2.00 USD
(60.606060... rounded to 60.61 EUR)
and a bank statement of two lines of 1.00 USD
(30.30303030... rounded to 30.30 EUR)
The exchanged invoice amount, 60.61 EUR, is not equal to the sum of
statement lines exchanged amount (30.30 + 30.30 = 60.60 EUR).
In such a case, two journal items should be created in addition:
- 0.01 in the debtors account
- 0.01 in the foreign exchange loss account
opw-640078
Revert edbd0df
Instead of removing the demo data (demo data is our friend), make the test more
specific, adding a date to match the rate of 1.5289 all year long.
Old demo data hardcoded the currency rate of USD to 1.5289 at the half
of the year, introducting new year red runbot.
Using assertAlmostEquals to avoid values like 32.730000000000004
Denis Ledoux
Martin Trigaux
qdp-odoo