The computation of the price without pricelist should take care of the unit of measure.
e.g. if computing discount for objects in dozen (on a product with price in unit), returned unit price should be (price*12) where 12 is the factor to go from dozen to unit.
Otherwise the compared prices (with and without pricelist) would not use the same unit of measure and the comparaison would be inconsistent. (opw 599727)
The price_surcharge attribute must be computed based on the reference unit of measure (divided by the factor).
This is to make sure than 12 units and 1 dozen have the same price after pricelist computation (opw 599727).
Added test checking the correctness of pricelist computation based on unit of measures.
When accessing an existing record in form mode directly (enter the url or refresh a page), the daterecord has not been initialized yet. This means that the value of actual_mode will be set to 'edit' before loading the current record (method _actualize_mode() called from do_show()).
This was problematic for one2many fields that we loaded in edit mode, showing add/delete icons/buttons in readonly views. (opw 607910)
This method trigger the focus event when clicking inside the modal, causing a blur event on other widgets resulting in unwanted problem. Typical case is for the jquery datetimepicker where we try to open a select element which will close right after.
The goal is to fill the page with at least 20 products and to fill all grid lines
Thus, the page should be filled with products until there are 20 products and all lines of the grid are full.
- fixed voting, karma check could be avoided
- fixed posting comments, now correctly checking karma (not for
notifications)
- fixed bootstraping of users, now not allowed to ask questions by default;
added validation email that gives the first karma points required to
participate
- added tests
One can infer related=True on a non-stored related field if all fields on the
path are related. This cannot be done if the related field is stored: when you
create a record, the database row is created first, and the related field is
computed and stored afterwards. Making the field required in that case would
trigger a non-null constraint violation.
This is a memory optimization: it reduces the memory footprint of each
registry. We have observed a reduction of 10Mb on a database with modules crm,
sale, purchase, stock.
Add readonly attribute to avoid sending both factor and factor_inv value to the backend when saving.
This was possible if the user switched between uom_type to fill the two fields.
Remove the hardcoded precision of 12 on factor and factor_inv,
to use the complete natural precision of NUMERIC types,
preserving all significant digits.
e.g. a UoM with a factor_inv of 6.0 used to be computed as:
factor_inv: 6.0 -> factor: 0.166666666667 (1.0/6.0, rounded to 12 digits) -> factor_inv: 5.999999999988 (1.0/factor)
which could lead to errors such 12*0.166666666667 = 2.000000000004 instead of 2.0
Slightly changed the way the ORM handles float fields to allow setting `digits=0`
as a way to explicitly require a NUMERIC value but without enforcing/rounding
the values at the ORM level, i.e. a truly full-precision field.
NUMERIC type has unlimited precision but is less efficient so should not be
used as the default behaviour, which is why we keep float8 as an alternative.
Modified the view to display the product UOM factor with a 5 digits value by default.
This value is for usability purpose only, the field still accepts bigger precision, by
setting the `digits` option on the field in the form view.
This change is safe in a stable series, the `digits=0` alternative is
treated the same as the default `digits=None` everywhere in the framework,
except when creating the database field.