the jquery method length() compute the height of its element, even if
it is diplay:none. But in our case, we want the offset to be zero if
there is no visible view_manager_header. (for example, general settings
in settings menu)
the height of the oe_view_manager_header is variable, and the top can't
be positioned correctly with pure css without a lot of work, so this
commit adds a touch of javascript to make sure that the view is
correctly positioned.
* oe_searchview_custom has been split in oe_searchview_custom and
oe_searchview_filter: a test need to take that into account
* in adjust_top, the parent might not have a $ method.
* separate the css class oe_searchview_custom into oe_searchview_custom
and oe_searchview_savefilter to be able to style them independently
* by default, the drawer has display:none
* fix a bug occuring when the user removed a custom filter (it hid the
remaining filters)
the header height is not fixed, it can change when the breadcrumbs
start a new line, or when there is only one view type (for ex, in most
reporting views). So, the top value of the view_manager_body has to be
adjusted accordingly.
after some thought, the extra method insert was not really necessary.
It was at first a way to force the user to give two nodes to determine
where the searchview and the drawer were to be inserted. However,
the second node can be omitted, a perfectly reasonable default is
to append the drawer just after the searchview.
Then, the role of insert is exactly the same as appendTo, so it makes
sense to override appendTo and remove insert. Simpler, and the job is done.
this commit splits the widget CustomFilters in two widgets:
CustomReports and SaveFilter. CustomReports is the widget
displaying the list of reports, and SaveFilter obviously is the
Save Current Filter widget.
The goal was to put the custom reports in the first column and the
Save Current Filter form in the second.
Before, the searchview and the searchview drawer had to be instantiated by
the user and appended separately to their correct place. Now, the
searchview is responsible for creating/destroying the drawer, and the
user is responsible for correctly using the insert method with
the node where the searchview/drawer are to be inserted.
the searchview has been splitted in two widgets: SearchView and
SearchViewDrawer. They are dependent of each other, so a drawer
has to be created for each searchview. This was not the case in
some form views (inline, created by a wizard).
the drawer wasn't closed when switching views, which might be a
problem when the user switches to a form view. Also, renames the
variable 'searchview_drawer' to 'drawer'.
incomplete work. So far, the search view widget has been split in
two widgets: SearchView and SearchViewDrawer. The SearchViewDrawer
has been inserted inline, and some preliminary work has been done
to improve the layout.
The following fixes have intentionally been reverted,
as the code has significantly changed and the bugs cannot
be reproduced:
- web_calendar fix (revid:dle@openerp.com-20140214114258-0hcsfdwyl61gph0v)
- CSS fix for buttons (revid:mat@openerp.com-20140213145755-txvtwqbfc83vnw9o)
bzr revid: odo@openerp.com-20140217102806-qg6kwk2jomdvvmlj
Closing previously occured on search request (so that a user wouldn't be able
to select "old" data on new search request), but ``search`` is only triggered
after the search delay. Worked when delay was 0, with it being moved to 250 a
user can get results matching the previous search instead of the current one.
Trigger a closing of the current results list on any ``input`` event, which is
when text is entered in any of the searchview's ``InputView``
bzr revid: dle@openerp.com-20140210140032-06dnlxepcc5ae21f
Closing previously occured on search request (so that a user wouldn't be able
to select "old" data on new search request), but ``search`` is only triggered
after the search delay. Worked when delay was 0, with it being moved to 250 a
user can get results matching the previous search instead of the current one.
Trigger a closing of the current results list on any ``input`` event, which is
when text is entered in any of the searchview's ``InputView``.
bzr revid: xmo@openerp.com-20140210123416-cfc0x24bfkiv4lse
Depending on the way the search view is setup, a single item
(e.g. "Search foo for bar") can follow a list of a bunch of
completions. In that case, it is hard to notice that it's not just one
more item of said list.
Add a marker on the first of every completion list in order to catch
1-item lists (or lists without titles/categories) and prepend a small
border every time, so that single-element completions following
lists-with-titles can be noticed.
bzr revid: xmo@openerp.com-20131107112858-1xyvcesize0doblz
Géry Debongnie
Christophe Simonis
Denis Ledoux
Gery Debongnie
Olivier Dony
Xavier Morel
Cecile Tonglet
Martin Trigaux
Xavier ALT