[IMP] doc: improve workflow documentation
bzr revid: rco@openerp.com-20130731135814-386v5w6rkc40kwwv
This commit is contained in:
parent
fc435af428
commit
3c0d11271e
|
@ -3,24 +3,29 @@
|
|||
Workflows
|
||||
=========
|
||||
|
||||
A workflow is a directed graph where the nodes are called "activities" and the
|
||||
arcs are called "transitions".
|
||||
In OpenERP, a workflow is a technical artefact to manage a set of "things to do"
|
||||
associated to the records of some data model. The workflow provides a higher-
|
||||
level way to organize the things to do on a record.
|
||||
|
||||
More specifically, a workflow is a directed graph where the nodes are called
|
||||
"activities" and the arcs are called "transitions".
|
||||
|
||||
- Activities define work that should be done within the OpenERP server, such as
|
||||
changing the state of some records, or sending mails.
|
||||
changing the state of some records, or sending emails.
|
||||
|
||||
- Transitions control how the workflow will go from activities to activities.
|
||||
- Transitions control how the workflow progresses from activity to activity.
|
||||
|
||||
When defining a workflow, one can attach conditions, signals, and triggers to
|
||||
transitions, so that the behavior of the workflow can depend on user actions
|
||||
(such as clicking on a button), changes to records, or arbitrary Python code.
|
||||
In the definition of a workflow, one can attach conditions, signals, and
|
||||
triggers to transitions, so that the behavior of the workflow depends on user
|
||||
actions (such as clicking on a button), changes to records, or arbitrary Python
|
||||
code.
|
||||
|
||||
Basics
|
||||
------
|
||||
|
||||
Defining a workflow with data files is straightforward: a record "workflow" is
|
||||
needed together with records for the activities and the transitions. For
|
||||
instance here is a simple sequence of two activities defined in XML::
|
||||
given together with records for the activities and the transitions. For
|
||||
instance, here is a simple sequence of two activities defined in XML::
|
||||
|
||||
<record id="test_workflow" model="workflow">
|
||||
<field name="name">test.workflow</field>
|
||||
|
@ -49,81 +54,82 @@ instance here is a simple sequence of two activities defined in XML::
|
|||
</record>
|
||||
|
||||
A worfklow is always defined with respect to a particular model (the model is
|
||||
given through the ``osv`` attribute on the ``workflow`` model). Methods
|
||||
specified in the activities or transitions will be called on that model.
|
||||
given by attribute ``osv`` on the model ``workflow``). Methods specified in the
|
||||
activities or transitions will be called on that model.
|
||||
|
||||
In the example code above, a workflow called "test_workflow" is created. It is
|
||||
made up of two activies, named "a" and "b", and one transition, going from "a"
|
||||
to "b".
|
||||
|
||||
The first activity has its ``flow_start`` attribute set to True so that OpenERP
|
||||
knows where to start the workflow when it is instanciated. Because
|
||||
``on_create`` is set to True on the workflow record, the workflow is
|
||||
The first activity has its attribute ``flow_start`` set to ``True`` so that
|
||||
OpenERP knows where to start the workflow traversal after it is instanciated.
|
||||
Because ``on_create`` is set to True on the workflow record, the workflow is
|
||||
instanciated for each newly created record. (Otherwise, the workflow should be
|
||||
created by other means, such as from some module Python code.)
|
||||
instanciated by other means, such as from some module Python code.)
|
||||
|
||||
When the workflow is instanciated, it will start by the "a" activity. That
|
||||
activity is of kind ``function`` which means the action ``print_a()`` is a
|
||||
method to be called on the ``test.workflow`` model (the usual ``cr, uid, ids,
|
||||
context`` arguments are passed for you).
|
||||
When the workflow is instanciated, it begins with activity "a". That activity is
|
||||
of kind ``function``, which means that the action ``print_a()`` is method call
|
||||
on the model ``test.workflow`` (the usual ``cr, uid, ids, context`` arguments
|
||||
are passed for you).
|
||||
|
||||
The transition between "a" and "b" does not specify any conditions. This means
|
||||
the workflow instance will immediately progress from "a" to "b" (after "a" has
|
||||
been processed), and thus also process the "b" activity.
|
||||
The transition between "a" and "b" does not specify any condition. This means
|
||||
that the workflow instance immediately goes from "a" to "b" after "a" has been
|
||||
processed, and thus also processes activity "b".
|
||||
|
||||
Transitions
|
||||
-----------
|
||||
|
||||
Transitions provide the control structures to orchestrate a workflow. When an
|
||||
activity is completed, the workflow engine will try to get across transitions
|
||||
departing from the completed activity, towards the next activities. In their
|
||||
simplest form they just link activities from one to the others (as in the
|
||||
example above), and activities are processed as soon as the activities
|
||||
preceding them are completed.
|
||||
activity is completed, the workflow engine tries to get across transitions
|
||||
departing from the completed activity, towards the next activities. In their
|
||||
simplest form (as in the example above), they link activities sequentially:
|
||||
activities are processed as soon as the activities preceding them are completed.
|
||||
|
||||
But instead of running all activities in one fell swoop, it is also possible to
|
||||
block on transitions, going through them only when some criteria are met. Such
|
||||
criteria are the conditions, the signals, and the triggers. They are detailed
|
||||
in the next sections.
|
||||
Instead of running all activities in one fell swoop, it is also possible to wait
|
||||
on transitions, going through them only when some criteria are met. The criteria
|
||||
are the conditions, the signals, and the triggers. They are detailed in the
|
||||
following sections.
|
||||
|
||||
Conditions
|
||||
''''''''''
|
||||
|
||||
When an activity has been completed, its outgoing transitions will be inspected
|
||||
to see if it is possible for the workflow instance to proceed through them and
|
||||
reach the next activities. When only a condition is defined (i.e. no signal or
|
||||
trigger is defined), the condition is evaluated by OpenERP, and if it evaluates
|
||||
to ``True``, the worklfow instance will go through.
|
||||
When an activity has been completed, its outgoing transitions are inspected to
|
||||
determine whether it is possible for the workflow instance to proceed through
|
||||
them and reach the next activities. When only a condition is defined (i.e., no
|
||||
signal or trigger is defined), the condition is evaluated by OpenERP, and if it
|
||||
evaluates to ``True``, the worklfow instance progresses through the transition.
|
||||
If the condition is not met, it will be reevaluated every time the associated
|
||||
record is modified, or by an explicit method call to do it.
|
||||
|
||||
By default, the ``condition`` attribute (i.e. the expression to be evaluated)
|
||||
is just "True", which will trivially evaluate to ``True``.
|
||||
|
||||
Actually, the condition can be several lines long, and the value of the last
|
||||
one will be used to test if the transition can be taken.
|
||||
By default, the attribute ``condition`` (i.e., the expression to be evaluated)
|
||||
is just "True", which trivially evaluates to ``True``. Note that the condition
|
||||
may be several lines long; in that case, the value of the last one determines
|
||||
whether the transition can be taken.
|
||||
|
||||
In the condition evaluation environment, several symbols are conveniently
|
||||
defined:
|
||||
|
||||
- The database cursor (``cr``),
|
||||
- the user ID (``uid``), the record ID tied to the workflow instance (``id``),
|
||||
- the user ID wrapped in a list (``ids``),
|
||||
- the database cursor (``cr``),
|
||||
- the user ID (``uid``),
|
||||
- the record ID tied to the workflow instance (``id``),
|
||||
- the record ID wrapped in a list (``ids``),
|
||||
- the model name (``model``),
|
||||
- the model instance (``obj``),
|
||||
- all the model column names,
|
||||
- and all the record (the one obtained by browsing the provided ID) attributes.
|
||||
- all the model column names, and
|
||||
- all the browse record's attributes.
|
||||
|
||||
Signals
|
||||
'''''''
|
||||
|
||||
In addition of a condition, a transition can specify a signal name. When such
|
||||
signal name is present, the transition will not be taken directly (even if the
|
||||
condition evaluates to true). Instead the transition will block, waiting to be
|
||||
In addition to a condition, a transition can specify a signal name. When such
|
||||
signal name is present, the transition is not taken directly, even if the
|
||||
condition evaluates to ``True``. Instead the transition blocks, waiting to be
|
||||
woken up.
|
||||
|
||||
To wake up a transition with a defined signal name, the signal must be sent to
|
||||
the workflow. A common way to send a signal is to use a button in the web
|
||||
interface, using the ``<button/>`` element with the signal name as the ``name``
|
||||
attribute of the button.
|
||||
In order to wake up a transition with a defined signal name, the signal must be
|
||||
sent to the workflow instance. A common way to send a signal is to use a button
|
||||
in the user interface, using the element ``<button/>`` with the signal name as
|
||||
the ``name`` attribute of the button. Once the button is clicked,
|
||||
|
||||
.. note:: The condition is still evaluated when the signal is sent to the
|
||||
workflow instance.
|
||||
|
@ -131,22 +137,22 @@ attribute of the button.
|
|||
Triggers
|
||||
''''''''
|
||||
|
||||
With conditions that evaluate to false, transitions are not taken (and thus the
|
||||
activity it leads to will not be processed). Still, the workflow instance can
|
||||
get new chances to progress across that transition by providing so-called
|
||||
triggers. The idea is that when the condition fails, triggers are recorded in
|
||||
database. Later, it is possible to wake-up specifically the workflow instances
|
||||
that installed those triggers, offering them a new chance to evaluation their
|
||||
transition conditions. This mechnism makes it cheaper to wake-up workflow
|
||||
With conditions that evaluate to ``False``, transitions are not taken (and thus
|
||||
the activity it leads to is not processed immediately). Still, the workflow
|
||||
instance can get new chances to progress across that transition by providing so-
|
||||
called triggers. The idea is that when the condition is not satisfied, triggers
|
||||
are recorded in database. Later, it is possible to wake up specifically the
|
||||
workflow instances that installed those triggers, offering them to reevaluate
|
||||
their transition conditions. This mechanism makes it cheaper to wake up workflow
|
||||
instances by targetting just a few of them (those that have installed the
|
||||
triggers) instead of all of them.
|
||||
|
||||
Triggers are recorded in database as record IDs (together with the model name)
|
||||
and refer to the workflow instance waiting for them. The transition definition
|
||||
can thus provide a Python expression (using the ``trigger_model`` attribute)
|
||||
that when evaluated will return the record IDs. Unlike the other expressions
|
||||
defined on the workflow, this one is evaluated with respect to a model that can
|
||||
be chosen on a per-transition basis with the ``trigger_expression`` attribute.
|
||||
and refer to the workflow instance waiting for those records. The transition
|
||||
definition provides a model name (attribute ``trigger_model``) and a Python
|
||||
expression (attribute ``trigger_expression``) that evaluates to a list of record
|
||||
IDs in the given model. Any of those records can wake up the workflow instance
|
||||
they are associated to.
|
||||
|
||||
.. note:: Note that triggers are not re-installed whenever the transition is
|
||||
re-tried.
|
||||
|
@ -154,128 +160,125 @@ be chosen on a per-transition basis with the ``trigger_expression`` attribute.
|
|||
Splitting and joining transitions
|
||||
'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
|
||||
|
||||
When multiple transitions leave the same activity, or lead to the same
|
||||
activity, OpenERP provides some control about which transitions will be
|
||||
crossed, or how the reached activity will be processed. The ``split_mode`` and
|
||||
``join_mode`` attributes on the activity are used for such control.
|
||||
When multiple transitions leave the same activity, or lead to the same activity,
|
||||
OpenERP provides some control over which transitions are actually taken, or how
|
||||
the reached activity will be processed. The attributes ``split_mode`` and
|
||||
``join_mode`` on the activity are used for such control. The possible values of
|
||||
those attributes are explained below.
|
||||
|
||||
Activities
|
||||
----------
|
||||
|
||||
While the transitions can be seen as the control structure of the workflows,
|
||||
activities are the place where everything happen, from changing record states
|
||||
While the transitions can be seen as the control structures of the workflows,
|
||||
activities are the places where everything happens, from changing record states
|
||||
to sending email.
|
||||
|
||||
Different kind of activities exist: ``Dummy``, ``Function``, ``Subflow``, and
|
||||
``Stop all``; different kind of activities can do different and they are
|
||||
detailed below.
|
||||
|
||||
In addition to the activity kind, activies have some properties, detailed in
|
||||
the next sections.
|
||||
Different kinds of activities exist: ``Dummy``, ``Function``, ``Subflow``, and
|
||||
``Stop all``, each doing different things when the activity is processed. In
|
||||
addition to their kind, activies have other properties, detailed in the next
|
||||
sections.
|
||||
|
||||
Flow start and flow stop
|
||||
''''''''''''''''''''''''
|
||||
|
||||
The ``flow_start`` attribute is a boolean value specifying if the activity
|
||||
starts the workflow. Multiple activities can have the ``flow_start`` attribute
|
||||
set to ``True`` and when instanciating a workflow for a record, OpenERP will
|
||||
simply process all of them, and try all their outgoing transitions afterwards.
|
||||
The attribute ``flow_start`` is a boolean value specifying whether the activity
|
||||
is processed when the workflow is instanciated. Multiple activities can have
|
||||
their attribute ``flow_start`` set to ``True``. When instanciating a workflow
|
||||
for a record, OpenERP simply processes all of them, and evaluate all their
|
||||
outgoing transitions afterwards.
|
||||
|
||||
The ``flow_stop`` attribute is also a boolean value, specifying if the activity
|
||||
ends the workflow. A workflow is considered to be completed when all its
|
||||
activities with the ``flow_stop`` attribute set to ``True`` are completed.
|
||||
|
||||
It is important for OpenERP to know when a workflow instance is completed: a
|
||||
workflow can have an activity that is actually another workflow (called a
|
||||
subflow) and that activity will be completed only when the subflow is
|
||||
The attribute ``flow_stop`` is a boolean value specifying whether the activity
|
||||
stops the workflow instance. A workflow instance is considered completed when
|
||||
all its activities with the ``flow_stop`` attribute set to ``True`` are
|
||||
completed.
|
||||
|
||||
It is important for OpenERP to know when a workflow instance is completed. A
|
||||
workflow can have an activity that is actually another workflow (called a
|
||||
subflow); that activity is completed when the subflow is completed.
|
||||
|
||||
Subflow
|
||||
'''''''
|
||||
|
||||
An activity can embed a complete workflow, called a subflow (the embedding
|
||||
workflow is called the parent workflow). The workflow to instanciate is
|
||||
specified by the ``subflow_id`` attribute.
|
||||
specified by attribute ``subflow_id``.
|
||||
|
||||
.. note:: In the GUI, that attribute can not be set unless the kind of the
|
||||
activity is ``Subflow``.
|
||||
|
||||
The activity will be completed (and its outgoing transitions will be tried)
|
||||
when the subflow is completed (see the ``flow_stop`` attribute above to read
|
||||
about when a workflow is considered completed by OpenERP).
|
||||
The activity is considered completed (and its outgoing transitions ready to be
|
||||
evaluated) when the subflow is completed (see attribute ``flow_stop`` above).
|
||||
|
||||
Sending a signal from a subflow
|
||||
'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
|
||||
|
||||
When a workflow is used (as a sublfow) in the activity of a (parent) workflow,
|
||||
the sublow can send a signal from its own activities to the parent by specifying a
|
||||
signal name in the ``signal_send`` attribute. OpenERP will process those
|
||||
activities normally and send to the parent workflow instance a signal with
|
||||
``signal_send`` value prefixed with ``subflow.``.
|
||||
When a workflow is embedded in an activity (as a subflow) of a workflow, the
|
||||
sublow can send a signal from its own activities to the parent workflow by
|
||||
giving a signal name in attribute ``signal_send``. OpenERP processes those
|
||||
activities by sending the value of ``signal_send`` prefixed by "subflow" to the
|
||||
parent workflow instance.
|
||||
|
||||
In other words, it is possible to react and take transitions in the parent
|
||||
In other words, it is possible to react and get transitions in the parent
|
||||
workflow as activities are executed in the sublow.
|
||||
|
||||
Server actions
|
||||
''''''''''''''
|
||||
|
||||
An activity can run a "Server Action" by specifying its ID in the ``action_id``
|
||||
attribute.
|
||||
An activity can run a "Server Action" by specifying its ID in the attribute
|
||||
``action_id``.
|
||||
|
||||
Python action
|
||||
'''''''''''''
|
||||
|
||||
An activity can run some Python code, provided through the ``action``
|
||||
attribute. See the section about transition conditions to read about the
|
||||
evaluation environment.
|
||||
An activity can execute some Python code, given by attribute ``action``. The
|
||||
evaluation environment is the same as the one explained in the section
|
||||
`Conditions`_.
|
||||
|
||||
Split mode
|
||||
''''''''''
|
||||
|
||||
After an activity has been processed, its outgoing transitions will be tried.
|
||||
Normally, if a transition can be taken, OpenERP will do it and proceed to the
|
||||
After an activity has been processed, its outgoing transitions are evaluated.
|
||||
Normally, if a transition can be taken, OpenERP traverses it and proceed to the
|
||||
activity the transition leads to.
|
||||
|
||||
Actually, when more than a single transition is leaving an activity, OpenERP
|
||||
can proceed, or not, depending on the other transitions. That is, the condition
|
||||
on the transitions can be combined together, and the combined result will
|
||||
instruct OpenERP to cross zero, one, or all the transitions. The way they are
|
||||
combined is controlled by the ``split_mode`` attribute.
|
||||
Actually, when more than a single transition is leaving an activity, OpenERP may
|
||||
proceed or not, depending on the other transitions. That is, the condition on
|
||||
the transitions can be combined together, and the combined result instructs
|
||||
OpenERP to traverse zero, one, or all the transitions. The way they are combined
|
||||
is controlled by the attribute ``split_mode``.
|
||||
|
||||
There are indeed three modes to decide how to combine the transition
|
||||
conditions, ``XOR``, ``OR``, and ``AND``.
|
||||
There are three possible split modes: ``XOR``, ``OR`` and ``AND``.
|
||||
|
||||
``XOR``
|
||||
When the transitions are combined with a ``XOR`` split mode, as soon as a
|
||||
transition with a condition that evaluates to true is found, the
|
||||
transition is taken and the other will not be tried.
|
||||
transition has a satisfied condition, the transition is traversed and the
|
||||
others are skipped.
|
||||
|
||||
``OR``
|
||||
With an ``OR`` mode, all the transitions with a condition that evaluates to
|
||||
true are taken. The remaining transitions will not be tried later.
|
||||
With the ``OR`` mode, all the transitions with a satisfied condition are
|
||||
traversed. The remaining transitions will not be evaluated later.
|
||||
|
||||
``AND``
|
||||
With an ``AND`` mode, OpenERP will wait for all transition conditions to
|
||||
evaluate to true, then cross all the transitions at the same time.
|
||||
With the ``AND`` mode, OpenERP will wait for all outgoing transition
|
||||
conditions to be satisfied, then traverse all of them at once.
|
||||
|
||||
Join mode
|
||||
'''''''''
|
||||
|
||||
Just as departing transition conditions can be combined together to decide
|
||||
whether they can be taken or not, arriving transitions can be combined together
|
||||
to decide if an activity must be run. The attribute to control that behavior is
|
||||
called ``join_mode``.
|
||||
Just like outgoing transition conditions can be combined together to decide
|
||||
whether they can be traversed or not, incoming transitions can be combined
|
||||
together to decide if and when an activity may be processed. The attribute
|
||||
``join_mode`` controls that behavior.
|
||||
|
||||
The join mode is a bit simpler than the split mode: only two modes are
|
||||
provided, ``XOR`` and ``AND``.
|
||||
There are two possible join modes: ``XOR`` and ``AND``.
|
||||
|
||||
``XOR``
|
||||
An activity with a ``XOR`` join mode will be run as soon as a transition is
|
||||
crossed to arrive at the activity.
|
||||
With the ``XOR`` mode, an incoming transition with a satisfied condition is
|
||||
traversed immediately, and enables the processing of the activity.
|
||||
|
||||
``AND``
|
||||
With an ``AND`` mode, the activity will wait for all its incoming
|
||||
transitions to be crossed before being run.
|
||||
With the ``AND`` mode, OpenERP will wait until all incoming transitions have
|
||||
been traversed before enabling the processing of the activity.
|
||||
|
||||
Kinds
|
||||
'''''
|
||||
|
@ -284,24 +287,25 @@ Activities can be of different kinds: ``dummy``, ``function``, ``subflow``, or
|
|||
``stopall``. The kind defines what type of work an activity can do.
|
||||
|
||||
Dummy
|
||||
The ``dummy`` kind is for activities that do nothing (i.e. they act as hubs
|
||||
to gather/dispatch transitions), or for activities that only call a Server
|
||||
Action.
|
||||
The ``dummy`` kind is for activities that do nothing, or for activities that
|
||||
only call a server action. Activities that do nothing can be used as hubs to
|
||||
gather/dispatch transitions.
|
||||
|
||||
Function
|
||||
The ``function`` kind is for activities that only need to run some Python
|
||||
code, and possibly a Server Action.
|
||||
code, and possibly a server action.
|
||||
|
||||
Stop all
|
||||
The ``stopall`` kind is for activities that will completely halt the
|
||||
workflow instance. In addition they can also run some Python code.
|
||||
The ``stopall`` kind is for activities that will completely stop the
|
||||
workflow instance and mark it as completed. In addition they can also run
|
||||
some Python code.
|
||||
|
||||
Subflow
|
||||
When the kind of the activity is ``subflow``, the activity will run
|
||||
another workflow. When the sub-workflow is completed, the activity will also be
|
||||
When the kind of the activity is ``subflow``, the activity embeds another
|
||||
workflow instance. When the subflow is completed, the activity is also
|
||||
considered completed.
|
||||
|
||||
Normally the sub-workflow is instanciated for the same record as the parent
|
||||
workflow. It is possible to change that default behavior by providing
|
||||
Python code that has to return a record ID for which a workflow has been
|
||||
instanciated.
|
||||
By default, the subflow is instanciated for the same record as the parent
|
||||
workflow. It is possible to change that behavior by providing Python code
|
||||
that returns a record ID (of the same data model as the subflow). The
|
||||
embedded subflow instance is then the one of the given record.
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue