linux/debian/patches-rt/0186-block-Use-cpu_chill-fo...

55 lines
1.7 KiB
Diff

From 18910a5357a094c2633239a2f877b65d5ab09c88 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Message-Id: <18910a5357a094c2633239a2f877b65d5ab09c88.1596234183.git.zanussi@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <378ee68279f6a7631221f2670a9298620148690d.1596234183.git.zanussi@kernel.org>
References: <378ee68279f6a7631221f2670a9298620148690d.1596234183.git.zanussi@kernel.org>
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 18:28:26 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 186/329] block: Use cpu_chill() for retry loops
Origin: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/4.19/older/patches-4.19.135-rt60.tar.xz
Retry loops on RT might loop forever when the modifying side was
preempted. Steven also observed a live lock when there was a
concurrent priority boosting going on.
Use cpu_chill() instead of cpu_relax() to let the system
make progress.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
block/blk-ioc.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-ioc.c b/block/blk-ioc.c
index 4c810969c3e2..48089f5bcc11 100644
--- a/block/blk-ioc.c
+++ b/block/blk-ioc.c
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
#include <linux/blkdev.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/sched/task.h>
+#include <linux/delay.h>
#include "blk.h"
@@ -119,7 +120,7 @@ static void ioc_release_fn(struct work_struct *work)
spin_unlock(q->queue_lock);
} else {
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ioc->lock, flags);
- cpu_relax();
+ cpu_chill();
spin_lock_irqsave_nested(&ioc->lock, flags, 1);
}
}
@@ -203,7 +204,7 @@ void put_io_context_active(struct io_context *ioc)
spin_unlock(icq->q->queue_lock);
} else {
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ioc->lock, flags);
- cpu_relax();
+ cpu_chill();
goto retry;
}
}
--
2.17.1