linux/debian/patches/features/all/rt/0003-futex-Clarify-mark_wak...

38 lines
1.6 KiB
Diff

From 38fcd06e9b7f6855db1f3ebac5e18b8fdb467ffd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Darren Hart (VMware)" <dvhart@infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 15:31:38 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] futex: Clarify mark_wake_futex memory barrier usage
Origin: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/4.11/older/patches-4.11.5-rt1.tar.xz
Clarify the scenario described in mark_wake_futex requiring the
smp_store_release(). Update the comment to explicitly refer to the
plist_del now under __unqueue_futex() (previously plist_del was in the
same function as the comment).
Signed-off-by: Darren Hart (VMware) <dvhart@infradead.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170414223138.GA4222@fury
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
kernel/futex.c | 9 +++++----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/futex.c
+++ b/kernel/futex.c
@@ -1380,10 +1380,11 @@ static void mark_wake_futex(struct wake_
wake_q_add(wake_q, p);
__unqueue_futex(q);
/*
- * The waiting task can free the futex_q as soon as
- * q->lock_ptr = NULL is written, without taking any locks. A
- * memory barrier is required here to prevent the following
- * store to lock_ptr from getting ahead of the plist_del.
+ * The waiting task can free the futex_q as soon as q->lock_ptr = NULL
+ * is written, without taking any locks. This is possible in the event
+ * of a spurious wakeup, for example. A memory barrier is required here
+ * to prevent the following store to lock_ptr from getting ahead of the
+ * plist_del in __unqueue_futex().
*/
smp_store_release(&q->lock_ptr, NULL);
}