linux/debian/patches/bugfix/all/NFSv4-Ensure-that-we-check-...

45 lines
1.2 KiB
Diff

From: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 12:48:35 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] NFSv4: Ensure that we check lock exclusive/shared type
against open modes
commit 55725513b5ef9d462aa3e18527658a0362aaae83 upstream.
Since we may be simulating flock() locks using NFS byte range locks,
we can't rely on the VFS having checked the file open mode for us.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
---
fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
index 3c787d0..ba837d9 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
@@ -4726,6 +4726,20 @@ nfs4_proc_lock(struct file *filp, int cmd, struct file_lock *request)
if (state == NULL)
return -ENOLCK;
+ /*
+ * Don't rely on the VFS having checked the file open mode,
+ * since it won't do this for flock() locks.
+ */
+ switch (request->fl_type & (F_RDLCK|F_WRLCK|F_UNLCK)) {
+ case F_RDLCK:
+ if (!(filp->f_mode & FMODE_READ))
+ return -EBADF;
+ break;
+ case F_WRLCK:
+ if (!(filp->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE))
+ return -EBADF;
+ }
+
do {
status = nfs4_proc_setlk(state, cmd, request);
if ((status != -EAGAIN) || IS_SETLK(cmd))
--
1.7.10