debian-packaging
/
linux
8
0
Fork 0
Code Releases Activity
linux/debian/patches-rt/0244-arch-arm64-Add-lazy-pr...

137 lines
5.7 KiB
Diff
Raw Permalink Blame History

From ea9b7de100fafa360831531e58151875918bbbba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Message-Id: <ea9b7de100fafa360831531e58151875918bbbba.1601675152.git.zanussi@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <5b5a156f9808b1acf1205606e03da117214549ea.1601675151.git.zanussi@kernel.org>
References: <5b5a156f9808b1acf1205606e03da117214549ea.1601675151.git.zanussi@kernel.org>
From: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 17:52:17 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 244/333] arch/arm64: Add lazy preempt support
Origin: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/4.19/older/patches-4.19.148-rt64.tar.xz
arm64 is missing support for PREEMPT_RT. The main feature which is
lacking is support for lazy preemption. The arch-specific entry code,
thread information structure definitions, and associated data tables
have to be extended to provide this support. Then the Kconfig file has
to be extended to indicate the support is available, and also to
indicate that support for full RT preemption is now available.
Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org>
---
arch/arm64/Kconfig | 1 +
arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h | 6 +++++-
arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c | 1 +
arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S | 12 +++++++++---
arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c | 2 +-
5 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
index 1fe3e5cb2927..6cbaf00c14ca 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
@@ -141,6 +141,7 @@ config ARM64
select HAVE_PERF_EVENTS
select HAVE_PERF_REGS
select HAVE_PERF_USER_STACK_DUMP
+ select HAVE_PREEMPT_LAZY
select HAVE_REGS_AND_STACK_ACCESS_API
select HAVE_RCU_TABLE_FREE
select HAVE_RSEQ
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h
index 69ac5262cccd..39e921817f28 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h
@@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ struct thread_info {
u64 ttbr0; /* saved TTBR0_EL1 */
#endif
int preempt_count; /* 0 => preemptable, <0 => bug */
+ int preempt_lazy_count; /* 0 => preemptable, <0 => bug */
};
#define thread_saved_pc(tsk) \
@@ -76,6 +77,7 @@ void arch_release_task_struct(struct task_struct *tsk);
#define TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE 3 /* CPU's FP state is not current's */
#define TIF_UPROBE 4 /* uprobe breakpoint or singlestep */
#define TIF_FSCHECK 5 /* Check FS is USER_DS on return */
+#define TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY 6
#define TIF_NOHZ 7
#define TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE 8
#define TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT 9
@@ -94,6 +96,7 @@ void arch_release_task_struct(struct task_struct *tsk);
#define _TIF_NEED_RESCHED (1 << TIF_NEED_RESCHED)
#define _TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME (1 << TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME)
#define _TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE (1 << TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE)
+#define _TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY (1 << TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY)
#define _TIF_NOHZ (1 << TIF_NOHZ)
#define _TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE (1 << TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE)
#define _TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT (1 << TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT)
@@ -107,8 +110,9 @@ void arch_release_task_struct(struct task_struct *tsk);
#define _TIF_WORK_MASK (_TIF_NEED_RESCHED | _TIF_SIGPENDING | \
_TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME | _TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE | \
- _TIF_UPROBE | _TIF_FSCHECK)
+ _TIF_UPROBE | _TIF_FSCHECK | _TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY)
+#define _TIF_NEED_RESCHED_MASK (_TIF_NEED_RESCHED | _TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY)
#define _TIF_SYSCALL_WORK (_TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE | _TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT | \
_TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT | _TIF_SECCOMP | \
_TIF_NOHZ)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c
index 92fba851ce53..844c71bc865b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c
@@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ int main(void)
BLANK();
DEFINE(TSK_TI_FLAGS, offsetof(struct task_struct, thread_info.flags));
DEFINE(TSK_TI_PREEMPT, offsetof(struct task_struct, thread_info.preempt_count));
+ DEFINE(TSK_TI_PREEMPT_LAZY, offsetof(struct task_struct, thread_info.preempt_lazy_count));
DEFINE(TSK_TI_ADDR_LIMIT, offsetof(struct task_struct, thread_info.addr_limit));
#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_SW_TTBR0_PAN
DEFINE(TSK_TI_TTBR0, offsetof(struct task_struct, thread_info.ttbr0));
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
index 5f800384cb9a..b582580c8c4c 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
@@ -623,11 +623,16 @@ el1_irq:
#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
ldr w24, [tsk, #TSK_TI_PREEMPT] // get preempt count
- cbnz w24, 1f // preempt count != 0
+ cbnz w24, 2f // preempt count != 0
ldr x0, [tsk, #TSK_TI_FLAGS] // get flags
- tbz x0, #TIF_NEED_RESCHED, 1f // needs rescheduling?
- bl el1_preempt
+ tbnz x0, #TIF_NEED_RESCHED, 1f // needs rescheduling?
+
+ ldr w24, [tsk, #TSK_TI_PREEMPT_LAZY] // get preempt lazy count
+ cbnz w24, 2f // preempt lazy count != 0
+ tbz x0, #TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY, 2f // needs rescheduling?
1:
+ bl el1_preempt
+2:
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS
bl trace_hardirqs_on
@@ -641,6 +646,7 @@ el1_preempt:
1: bl preempt_schedule_irq // irq en/disable is done inside
ldr x0, [tsk, #TSK_TI_FLAGS] // get new tasks TI_FLAGS
tbnz x0, #TIF_NEED_RESCHED, 1b // needs rescheduling?
+ tbnz x0, #TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY, 1b // needs rescheduling?
ret x24
#endif
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c
index ca565853dea6..3f321daa7702 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c
@@ -919,7 +919,7 @@ asmlinkage void do_notify_resume(struct pt_regs *regs,
/* Check valid user FS if needed */
addr_limit_user_check();
- if (thread_flags & _TIF_NEED_RESCHED) {
+ if (thread_flags & _TIF_NEED_RESCHED_MASK) {
/* Unmask Debug and SError for the next task */
local_daif_restore(DAIF_PROCCTX_NOIRQ);
--
2.17.1
View Git Blame Copy Permalink