linux/debian/patches-rt/0179-block-mq-do-not-invoke...

62 lines
2.0 KiB
Diff

From 693f3a3441b78284a309d854f118832a0735d4b3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Message-Id: <693f3a3441b78284a309d854f118832a0735d4b3.1601675152.git.zanussi@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <5b5a156f9808b1acf1205606e03da117214549ea.1601675151.git.zanussi@kernel.org>
References: <5b5a156f9808b1acf1205606e03da117214549ea.1601675151.git.zanussi@kernel.org>
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 14:26:34 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 179/333] block/mq: do not invoke preempt_disable()
Origin: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/4.19/older/patches-4.19.148-rt64.tar.xz
preempt_disable() and get_cpu() don't play well together with the sleeping
locks it tries to allocate later.
It seems to be enough to replace it with get_cpu_light() and migrate_disable().
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
---
block/blk-mq.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index eae78363c036..830944372d51 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -570,7 +570,7 @@ static void __blk_mq_complete_request(struct request *rq)
return;
}
- cpu = get_cpu();
+ cpu = get_cpu_light();
if (!test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_SAME_FORCE, &rq->q->queue_flags))
shared = cpus_share_cache(cpu, ctx->cpu);
@@ -582,7 +582,7 @@ static void __blk_mq_complete_request(struct request *rq)
} else {
rq->q->softirq_done_fn(rq);
}
- put_cpu();
+ put_cpu_light();
}
static void hctx_unlock(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, int srcu_idx)
@@ -1380,14 +1380,14 @@ static void __blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, bool async,
return;
if (!async && !(hctx->flags & BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING)) {
- int cpu = get_cpu();
+ int cpu = get_cpu_light();
if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, hctx->cpumask)) {
__blk_mq_run_hw_queue(hctx);
- put_cpu();
+ put_cpu_light();
return;
}
- put_cpu();
+ put_cpu_light();
}
kblockd_mod_delayed_work_on(blk_mq_hctx_next_cpu(hctx), &hctx->run_work,
--
2.17.1