From 5140dcf50322edf0cdf99c17c7f83650a11b20bd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 Message-Id: <5140dcf50322edf0cdf99c17c7f83650a11b20bd.1601675152.git.zanussi@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <5b5a156f9808b1acf1205606e03da117214549ea.1601675151.git.zanussi@kernel.org> References: <5b5a156f9808b1acf1205606e03da117214549ea.1601675151.git.zanussi@kernel.org> From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 19:03:16 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 122/333] net/core: use local_bh_disable() in netif_rx_ni() Origin: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/4.19/older/patches-4.19.148-rt64.tar.xz In 2004 netif_rx_ni() gained a preempt_disable() section around netif_rx() and its do_softirq() + testing for it. The do_softirq() part is required because netif_rx() raises the softirq but does not invoke it. The preempt_disable() is required to remain on the same CPU which added the skb to the per-CPU list. All this can be avoided be putting this into a local_bh_disable()ed section. The local_bh_enable() part will invoke do_softirq() if required. Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior --- net/core/dev.c | 6 ++---- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c index ccedc620795c..414e4d7e2082 100644 --- a/net/core/dev.c +++ b/net/core/dev.c @@ -4526,11 +4526,9 @@ int netif_rx_ni(struct sk_buff *skb) trace_netif_rx_ni_entry(skb); - preempt_disable(); + local_bh_disable(); err = netif_rx_internal(skb); - if (local_softirq_pending()) - do_softirq(); - preempt_enable(); + local_bh_enable(); return err; } -- 2.17.1