NFSv4: Fix error handling and improve error reporting for file locking (Closes: #669270)

- Rate limit the state manager for lock reclaim warning messages
- Ensure that the LOCK code sets exception->inode
- Ensure that we check lock exclusive/shared type against open modes

svn path=/dists/sid/linux-2.6/; revision=18955
This commit is contained in:
Ben Hutchings 2012-04-27 02:44:50 +00:00
parent 4c8e51eed3
commit c5f48a38f4
5 changed files with 132 additions and 0 deletions

5
debian/changelog vendored
View File

@ -19,6 +19,11 @@ linux-2.6 (3.2.16-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
* rt2x00: Identify rt2800usb chipsets. (Closes: #658067)
* [x86] Add EFI boot stub support (Closes: #669033)
* brcmsmac: "INTERMEDIATE but not AMPDU" only when tracing
* NFSv4: Fix error handling and improve error reporting for file locking
(Closes: #669270)
- Rate limit the state manager for lock reclaim warning messages
- Ensure that the LOCK code sets exception->inode
- Ensure that we check lock exclusive/shared type against open modes
-- Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> Mon, 16 Apr 2012 02:27:29 +0100

View File

@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
From: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 12:20:10 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] NFSv4: Ensure that the LOCK code sets exception->inode
commit 05ffe24f5290dc095f98fbaf84afe51ef404ccc5 upstream.
All callers of nfs4_handle_exception() that need to handle
NFS4ERR_OPENMODE correctly should set exception->inode
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
---
fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 9 +++++++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
index f82bde0..3c787d0 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
@@ -4558,7 +4558,9 @@ static int _nfs4_do_setlk(struct nfs4_state *state, int cmd, struct file_lock *f
static int nfs4_lock_reclaim(struct nfs4_state *state, struct file_lock *request)
{
struct nfs_server *server = NFS_SERVER(state->inode);
- struct nfs4_exception exception = { };
+ struct nfs4_exception exception = {
+ .inode = state->inode,
+ };
int err;
do {
@@ -4576,7 +4578,9 @@ static int nfs4_lock_reclaim(struct nfs4_state *state, struct file_lock *request
static int nfs4_lock_expired(struct nfs4_state *state, struct file_lock *request)
{
struct nfs_server *server = NFS_SERVER(state->inode);
- struct nfs4_exception exception = { };
+ struct nfs4_exception exception = {
+ .inode = state->inode,
+ };
int err;
err = nfs4_set_lock_state(state, request);
@@ -4676,6 +4680,7 @@ static int nfs4_proc_setlk(struct nfs4_state *state, int cmd, struct file_lock *
{
struct nfs4_exception exception = {
.state = state,
+ .inode = state->inode,
};
int err;
--
1.7.10

View File

@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
From: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 12:48:35 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] NFSv4: Ensure that we check lock exclusive/shared type
against open modes
commit 55725513b5ef9d462aa3e18527658a0362aaae83 upstream.
Since we may be simulating flock() locks using NFS byte range locks,
we can't rely on the VFS having checked the file open mode for us.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
---
fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
index 3c787d0..ba837d9 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
@@ -4726,6 +4726,20 @@ nfs4_proc_lock(struct file *filp, int cmd, struct file_lock *request)
if (state == NULL)
return -ENOLCK;
+ /*
+ * Don't rely on the VFS having checked the file open mode,
+ * since it won't do this for flock() locks.
+ */
+ switch (request->fl_type & (F_RDLCK|F_WRLCK|F_UNLCK)) {
+ case F_RDLCK:
+ if (!(filp->f_mode & FMODE_READ))
+ return -EBADF;
+ break;
+ case F_WRLCK:
+ if (!(filp->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE))
+ return -EBADF;
+ }
+
do {
status = nfs4_proc_setlk(state, cmd, request);
if ((status != -EAGAIN) || IS_SETLK(cmd))
--
1.7.10

View File

@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
From: William Dauchy <wdauchy@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 12:32:04 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] NFSv4: Rate limit the state manager for lock reclaim warning
messages
commit 96dcadc2fdd111dca90d559f189a30c65394451a upstream.
Adding rate limit on `Lock reclaim failed` messages since it could fill
up system logs
Signed-off-by: William Dauchy <wdauchy@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
[bwh: Backported to 3.2: add the 'NFS:' prefix at the same time]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
---
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4state.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4state.c
@@ -1261,8 +1261,9 @@ restart:
spin_lock(&state->state_lock);
list_for_each_entry(lock, &state->lock_states, ls_locks) {
if (!(lock->ls_flags & NFS_LOCK_INITIALIZED))
- printk("%s: Lock reclaim failed!\n",
- __func__);
+ pr_warn_ratelimited("NFS: "
+ "%s: Lock reclaim "
+ "failed!\n", __func__);
}
spin_unlock(&state->state_lock);
nfs4_put_open_state(state);

View File

@ -184,3 +184,6 @@
+ features/x86/efi-stub/0010-x86-efi-Break-up-large-initrd-reads.patch
+ features/x86/efi-stub/0011-x86-efi-Fix-pointer-math-issue-in-handle_ramdisks.patch
+ bugfix/all/brcmsmac-INTERMEDIATE-but-not-AMPDU-only-when-tracin.patch
+ bugfix/all/NFSv4-Rate-limit-the-state-manager-for-lock-reclaim-.patch
+ bugfix/all/NFSv4-Ensure-that-the-LOCK-code-sets-exception-inode.patch
+ bugfix/all/NFSv4-Ensure-that-we-check-lock-exclusive-shared-typ.patch