From 08978a784504051d93b3c893e977177d1598b325 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andres Salomon Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 12:12:13 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] there's no real need for two kernel-package deps, are there? :P svn path=/trunk/kernel/source/linux-kernel-2.6.12/; revision=3443 --- debian/templates/control.source.in | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/debian/templates/control.source.in b/debian/templates/control.source.in index 9ff48d090..28015d40b 100644 --- a/debian/templates/control.source.in +++ b/debian/templates/control.source.in @@ -3,5 +3,5 @@ Section: devel Priority: optional Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team Standards-Version: 3.6.1.0 -Build-Depends: gcc (>= 4:3.3), debhelper (>= 4), kernel-package (>= 9.000), module-init-tools, dpkg-dev (>= 1.10.23), debianutils (>= 1.6), bzip2, console-tools, sparc-utils [sparc] +Build-Depends: gcc (>= 4:3.3), debhelper (>= 4), module-init-tools, dpkg-dev (>= 1.10.23), debianutils (>= 1.6), bzip2, console-tools, sparc-utils [sparc] Build-Depends-Indep: bzip2, debhelper (>= 4), docbook-utils, gs, kernel-package (>= 9.000), transfig, xmlto, dh-kpatches (>= 0.99.3)