In an Inter-RAT setup a UE could perform a RAU coming from a 4G network.
In that case the UE/MS is unknown to the SGSN and it should request the
SGSN context (MM, PDP) from the MME. This is done through the following
GTPv1C message exchange on the Gn interface of SGSN and MME:
SGSN -> MME: SGSN Context Request
SGSN <- MME: SGSN Context Response
SGSN -> MME: SGSN Context Acknowledge
This commit doesn't aim to be a complete implementation of the mentioned
procedure, since it's quite a complex one, with lots of fields and logic
required. This so far only implements in general the minimally
successful case by filling as much as possible the required set of
fields.
This will allow for a base onto which do incremental improvements and
fixes while testing against UEs and SGSNs (such as osmo-sgsn, which
doesn't yet support this procedure but will potentially earn it soon).
This commit doesn't implement the reverse direction, aka UE issuing cell
reselection 2G->4G. Initial support for this scenario will hopefully be
added soon as a follow-up patch, similar to this one.
Related: https://osmocom.org/issues/6294
As per TS 29.060:
The Initial/request message is "SGSN Context Request", sent by peer A.
Peer B sends a response message "SGSN Context Response" with same SeqNr.
Peer A sends a response message "SGSN Context Acknowledge" with same
SeqNr.
If Peer B doesn't see a "SGSN Context Acknowlegde", it should keep
retransmitting "SGSN Context Response" as usual.
In an Inter-RAT setup a UE could perform a RAU coming from a 4G network.
In that case the UE/MS is unknown to the SGSN and it should request the
SGSN context (MM, PDP) from the MME. This is done through the following
GTPv1C message exchange on the Gn interface of SGSN and MME:
SGSN -> MME: SGSN Context Request
SGSN <- MME: SGSN Context Response
SGSN -> MME: SGSN Context Acknowledge
This commit doesn't aim to be a complete implementation of the mentioned
procedure, since it's quite a complex one, with lots of fields and logic
required. This so far only implements in general the minimally
successful case by filling as much as possible the required set of
fields.
This will allow for a base onto which do incremental improvements and
fixes while testing against UEs and SGSNs (such as osmo-sgsn, which
doesn't yet support this procedure but will potentially earn it soon).
This commit doesn't implement the reverse direction, aka UE issuing cell
reselection 2G->4G. Initial support for this scenario will hopefully be
added soon as a follow-up patch, similar to this one.
Related: https://osmocom.org/issues/6294
This information will be required by the Gn interface in MME when
answering an SGSN with an "SGSN Context Response" message during MS cell
reselection EUTRAN->GERAN.
* [AMF/MME] UEContextReleaseCommand in Integrity (#2786)
Modified not to send UEContextReleaseCommand in Integrity Unprotected
NAS message such like Registration or Service request.
* [AMF/MME] UEContextReleaseCommand after Interity Protected (#2786)
Modified not to send UEContextReleaseCommand in Integrity Unprotected
NAS message such like Registration or Service request.
* Update 03-VoLTE-dockerized.md
adding "-" in docker-compose commands and added filename t the docker-compose command
* Adding up command to docker-compose
Need to bring docker images up to run the Open5Gs system.
Allow network operators to omit the time zone in the 4G EMM Information
and 5G Configuration Update. This is useful for better compatibility
with some UEs.
The parameter is optional according to:
* 4G: 3GPP TS 24.301 Table 8.2.13.1
* 5G: 3GPP TS 24.501 Table 8.2.19.1.1
Bug:
In case that AMF does not have subscription data for the UE,
PDU session remains unreleased after implicit de-registeration.
The exact test case:
- UE registered (integrity protection applied)
- UE deregistered (Nudm_SDM_Unsubscribe, Nudm_UECM_Registration (purgeFlag))
- UE registered, PDU session activated
UE data are still stored in AMF. So if integrity protected applies,
the steps 4 - 14 [ETSI TS 123 502 V16.7.0](https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/123500_123599/123502/16.07.00_60/ts_123502v160700p.pdf) are skipped.
Only AM Policy Association Establishment is performed.
- UE is moved out of radio coverage, 2 x (4 min + Timer t3512) expires
Result: UE is implicitly de-registered, PDU session is not released
The steps of implicit de-registeration:
1. Implicit Timer Expiration
2. UDM_SDM_Unsubscribe
3. UDM_UECM_Deregistration
4. PDU session release request
5. PDUSessionResourceReleaseCommand + PDU session release command
6. PDUSessionResourceReleaseResponse
7. AM_Policy_Association_Termination
So PDU session release is performed after the confirmation of
UDM_UECM_Deregistration.
Since there is no UDM_SDM subscription, the UDM steps are skipped
and PDU session is not released.
Fix:
If the AMF does not have subscription data for the UE which registers,
the AMF registers with the UDM using Nudm_UECM_Registration and
retrieves subscription data with Nudm_SDM_Get.
[ETSI TS 123 502 V16.7.0](https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/123500_123599/123502/16.07.00_60/ts_123502v160700p.pdf), 4.2.2.2.2 General Registration, 14a-c:
> If the AMF does not have subscription data for the UE, the AMF retrieves the Access and Mobility Subscription data, SMF
> Selection Subscription data, UE context in SMF data and LCS mobile origination using Nudm_SDM_Get.
1. UE sends RegistrationRequest to AMF.
2. AMF sends Nudm_UECM_Registration to UDM.
3. UE sends RegistrationRequest to AMF.
4. GMM state is gmm_state_authentication
5. UDM sends Nudm_UECM_Registration response to AMF.
6. AMF crashs since no Handler in gmm_state_authentication state
According to 3GPP TS 29.510, the search parameter "tai" should be a
single item, not an array of items.
TS 29.510: Table 6.2.3.2.3.1-1:
URI query parameters supported by the GET method on this resource
Revert "[SBI] Change discovery option TAI from array to single item"
This reverts commit b4beff1ae16c64b3c6d84d8bdb47c36e19b705f2.
wip
This problem can be occurred in the following scenarios.
1. Run NFs(NRF/SCP/SMF/UPF/AUSF/UDM/PCF/BSF/NSSF/UDR) except AMF.
2. Run AMF
3. Run gNB/UE and try to register
4. STOP PCF
5. AMF Crashed
AMF discovered the PCF through SCP during the UE registration process.
At this time, ogs_sbi_nf_fsm_init() is not called,
so AMF does not have state information about PCF.
In other words, AMF state is NULL.
In such a situation, when PCF is terminated at this time,
a crash occurs as AMF attempts to change the PCF state.
So, I've fixed that state information is initialized to solve this problem.
This commit splits filling Requested-Service-Unit, Used-Service-Unit and
QoS-Information into their own helper functions for better readibility,
and then partially reverts 125740727e,
where lots of AVPs were left out of INITIAL_REQUEST messagesi during the
changes made.
After looking through 3GPP TS 32.299 and rfc4006, it seems expected to
send Requested-Service-Unit only during INITIAL_REQUEST, and
Used-Service-Unit during UPDATE_REQUEST, so that part is kept.
However, I am not able to find clear indications that AVPs such as QoS
Information and RAT-Type should not be sent during INITIAL_REQUEST.
So, since we have the info, better set it already during
INITIAL_REQUEST, since the OCS may want to grant different resources
based on that information if available too.
Sukchan Lee
Pau Espin
jmasterfunk84
Stare Gaber
mitmitmitm
Oliver Smith
joereith
gstaa
Bostjan Meglic